Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33574139›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Adjunctive IgM-enriched immunoglobulin therapy with a personalised dose based on serum IgM-titres versus standard dose in the treatment of septic shock: a randomised controlled trial (IgM-fat trial).

Emanuela Biagioni, Martina Tosi, Giorgio Berlot, Giacomo Castiglione, Alberto Corona, Maria Giovanna De Cristofaro, Abele Donati, Paolo Feltracco, Francesco Forfori, Fiorentino Fragranza and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04182737 (Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive IgM-enriched Immunoglobulin Therapy With a Personalized Dose Based on Serum IgM-titers vs. Standard Dose in Patients With Septic Shock. A Multicenter, Interventional, Randomized, Single-blinded, Two Arms Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04182737 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive IgM-enriched Immunoglobulin Therapy With a Personalized Dose Based on Serum IgM-titers vs. Standard Dose in Patients With Septic Shock. A Multicenter, Interventional, Randomized, Single-blinded, Two Arms Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassimo GirardisRan2020 to 2022Enrolled356ConditionsShock, Septic, Sepsis, HypoglobulinemiaArmsIgM-enriched polyclonal immunoglobulins titer-based treatment, IgM-enriched polyclonal immunoglobulins Flat treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuela BiagioniAnesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Martina TosiAnesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Giorgio BerlotAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Major Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy.
Giacomo CastiglioneAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Vittorio Emanuele Catania Polyclinic, Catania, Sicilia, Italy.
Alberto CoronaAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Maria Giovanna De CristofaroAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Abele DonatiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona Umberto I G M Lancisi G Salesi, Ancona, Marche, Italy.
Paolo FeltraccoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy.
Francesco ForforiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Toscana, Italy.
Fiorentino FragranzaAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Cotugno Hospital, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Patrizia MurinoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Ornella PiazzaAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Campania, Italy.
Livio TulloAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Foggia University Hospital, Foggia, Puglia, Italy.
Giacomo GrasselliAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, La Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore di Milano Policlinico, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.
Roberto D'AmicoMedical and Surgical Science, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Massimo GirardisAnesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy girardis.massimo@unimo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2453-0829
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Ospedale - Università Padova · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITOspedale D. Cotugno · ITOspedale Monaldi · ITOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn patients with septic shock, low levels of circulating immunoglobulins are common and their kinetics appear to be related to clinical outcome. The pivotal role of immunoglobulins in the host immune response to infection suggests that additional therapy with polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulins may be a promising option in patients with septic shock. Immunoglobulin preparations enriched with the IgM component have largely been used in sepsis, mostly at standard dosages (250 mg/kg per day), regardless of clinical severity and without any dose adjustment based on immunoglobulin serum titres or other biomarkers. We hypothesised that a personalised dose of IgM enriched preparation based on patient IgM titres and aimed to achieve a specific threshold of IgM titre is more effective in decreasing mortality than a standard dose. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is designed as a multicentre, interventional, randomised, single-blinded, prospective, investigator sponsored, two-armed study. Patients with septic shock and IgM titres <60 mg/dL will be randomly assigned to an IgM titre-based treatment or a standard treatment group in a ratio of 1:1. The study will involve 12 Italian intensive care units and 356 patients will be enrolled. Patients assigned to the IgM titre-based treatment will receive a personalised daily dose based on an IgM serum titre aimed at achieving serum titres above 100 mg/dL up to discontinuation of vasoactive drugs or day 7 after enrolment. Patients assigned to the IgM standard treatment group will receive IgM enriched preparation daily for three consecutive days at the standard dose of 250 mg/kg. The primary endpoint will be all-cause mortality at 28 days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of the coordinating centre (Comitato Etico dell'Area Vasta Emilia Nord) and collaborating centres. The results of the trial will be published within 12 months from the end of the study and the steering committee has the right to present them at public symposia and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: The trial protocol and information documents have received a favourable opinion from the Area Vasta Emilia Nord Ethical Committee on 12 September 2019. The trial protocol has been registered on EudraCT (2018-001613-33) on 18 April 2018 and on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04182737) on 2 December 2019.

Indexed as

COVID-19Shock, SepticHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunoglobulin MProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeImmunoglobulin Mimmunologyinfectious diseasesintensive & critical care

Identifiers

PMID33574139
PMCPMC7880103
OpenAlexW3128059208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.