Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573890›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes and its complications2021

Psychosocial health in people with diabetes during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark.

Kristoffer Panduro Madsen, Ingrid Willaing, Naja Hulvej Rod, Tibor V Varga, Lene Eide Joensen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristoffer Panduro MadsenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Niels Steensens Vej 6, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark. Electronic address: Kristoffer.panduro.madsen@regionh.dk.
Ingrid WillaingSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Niels Steensens Vej 6, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark; Section for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 København K, Denmark.
Naja Hulvej RodSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 København K, Denmark.
Tibor V VargaSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 København K, Denmark.
Lene Eide JoensenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Niels Steensens Vej 6, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark.
Steno Diabetes Center · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo analyze trajectories of psychosocial health among people with diabetes during the first three months of lockdowns and reopenings of the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark.

methodsAn online longitudinal survey of 2430 people with diabetes consisting of six questionnaire waves (Q1-Q6) was conducted between March 19 and June 25, 2020. Psychosocial outcomes assessed were COVID-19 worries, quality of life, feelings of social isolation, psychological distress, diabetes distress, anxiety, and general and diabetes-specific loneliness. Trajectories in psychosocial health were analyzed with linear multilevel mixed-effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted.

resultsIn total, 1366 (56%) people with diabetes responded to the first questionnaire. COVID-19 worries, feelings of social isolation, psychological distress, anxiety and general loneliness had all improved at Q6 compared to Q1 (p < 0.001). In general, improvements in psychosocial health started after the first reopening phase (April 15); however, general loneliness increased up to the first reopening phase (p ≤  0.001) before decreasing, and quality of life decreased up to the first reopening phase (p = 0.002), with no improvements to follow. Subgroup analyses revealed that women had larger decreases in feelings of social isolation (p < 0.001) and in psychological distress (p = 0.035) and increases in quality of life (p < 0.001), between Q1 and Q6, compared to men.

conclusionsPsychosocial health in people with diabetes improved following reopening of society. However, increases in loneliness and decreases in quality of life during lockdown indicates a potential need to mitigate the acute effects of such policies.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlMental HealthAgedAnxietyCOVID-19DenmarkDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansLonelinessLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSocial IsolationStress, PsychologicalCOVID-19Diabetes mellitusLonelinessPsychosocial factorsQuality of lifeSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID33573890
PMCPMC7816585
OpenAlexW3124839476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.