Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573701›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives in health and social services: protocol for a scoping review and Delphi survey.

Ali Ben Charif, Karine V Plourde, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Amédé Gogovor, Sharon Straus, Ron Beleno, Kathy Kastner, Robert K D McLean, Andrew J Milat and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Equitable Patient and Public Involvement Strategies for Scaling Health and Social Care Interventions: A Consensus Study Inspired by Delphi Methods.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling initiatives in health and social services: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Ali Ben CharifVITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-2910
Karine V PlourdeVITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
Sabrina Guay-BélangerVITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
Hervé Tchala Vignon ZomahounVITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
Amédé GogovorVITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
Sharon StrausLiKaShing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ron BelenoAge-Well NCE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kathy KastnerBest Endings, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robert K D McLeanInternational Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Andrew J MilatSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Jean-Sébastien PaquetteVITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada.
Friedemann GeigerSHARE TO CARE Project, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany.
France LégaréVITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca.
RePOS Network
Université Laval · CAHunter Medical Research Institute · AUInternational Development Research Centre · CAMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DESt. Michael's Hospital · CAToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CADiabetes Canada · CAThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

CIHR FDN-159931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe scale-up of evidence-based innovations is required to reduce waste and inequities in health and social services (HSS). However, it often tends to be a top-down process initiated by policy makers, and the values of the intended beneficiaries are forgotten. Involving multiple stakeholders including patients and the public in the scaling-up process is thus essential but highly complex. We propose to identify relevant strategies for meaningfully and equitably involving patients and the public in the science and practice of scaling up in HSS.

methodsWe will adapt our overall method from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Following this, we will perform a two-prong study design (knowledge synthesis and Delphi study) grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach. This approach involves extensive participation of a network of stakeholders interested in patient and public involvement (PPI) in scaling up and a multidisciplinary steering committee. We will conduct a systematic scoping review following the methodology recommended in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. We will use the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants-any stakeholder involved in creating or testing a strategy for PPI; (2) intervention-any PPI strategy proposed for scaling-up initiatives; (3) comparator-no restriction; (4) outcomes: any process or outcome metrics related to PPI; and (5) setting-HSS. We will search electronic databases (e.g., Medline, Web of Science, Sociological Abstract) from inception onwards, hand search relevant websites, screen the reference lists of included records, and consult experts in the field. Two reviewers will independently select and extract eligible studies. We will summarize data quantitatively and qualitatively and report results using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will conduct an online Delphi survey to achieve consensus on the relevant strategies for PPI in scaling-up initiatives in HSS. Participants will include stakeholders from low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We anticipate that three rounds will allow an acceptable degree of agreement on research priorities. DISCUSSION: Our findings will advance understanding of how to meaningfully and equitably involve patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives for sustainable HSS. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: We registered this protocol with the Open Science Framework on August 19, 2020 ( https://osf.io/zqpx7/ ).

Indexed as

Research DesignResearch ReportHumansKnowledgePatient ParticipationScoping Reviews as TopicSocial WorkHealth and social servicesImplementation scienceKnowledge translationPatient and public involvementScaling scienceScaling upSpreadStrategy

Identifiers

PMID33573701
PMCPMC7877693
OpenAlexW3125206280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.