Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573700›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2021

Linkage between the intestinal microbiota and residual feed intake in broiler chickens.

Jing Liu, Sydney N Stewart, Kelsy Robinson, Qing Yang, Wentao Lyu, Melanie A Whitmore, Guolong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of dietary fermented passion fruit (Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Supplementation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jing Liu *Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Sydney N Stewart *Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Kelsy RobinsonDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Qing YangDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Wentao LyuDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Melanie A WhitmoreDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Guolong ZhangDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. zguolon@okstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4781-5816
Oklahoma State University · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2018-67011-28041National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2018-68003-27462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntestinal microbiota plays a key role in nutrient digestion and utilization with a profound impact on feed efficiency of livestock animals. However, the intestinal microbes that are critically involved in feed efficiency remain elusive.

methodsTo identify intestinal bacteria associated with residual feed intake (RFI) in chickens, male Cobb broiler chicks were individually housed from day 14 to day 35. Individual RFI values were calculated for 56 chickens. Luminal contents were collected from the ileum, cecum, and cloaca of each animal on day 35. Bacterial DNA was isolated and subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Intestinal microbiota was classified to the feature level using Deblur and QIIME 2. High and low RFI groups were formed by selecting 15 and 17 chickens with the most extreme RFI values for subsequent LEfSe comparison of the difference in the microbiota. Spearman correlation analysis was further performed to identify correlations between the intestinal microbiota composition and RFI.

resultsNo significant difference in evenness, richness, and overall diversity of the microbiota in the ileum, cecum, or cloaca was observed between high and low RFI chickens. However, LEfSe analysis revealed a number of bacterial features being differentially enriched in either high or low RFI chickens. Spearman correlation analysis further identified many differentially enriched bacterial features to be significantly correlated with RFI (P < 0.05). Importantly, not all short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers showed a positive association with RFI. While two novel members of Oscillibacter and Butyricicoccus were more abundant in low-RFI, high-efficiency chickens, several other SCFA producers such as Subdoligranulum variabile and two related Peptostreptococcaceae members were negatively associated with feed efficiency. Moreover, a few closely-related Lachnospiraceae family members showed a positive correlation with feed efficiency, while others of the same family displayed an opposite relationship.

conclusionsOur results highlight the complexity of the intestinal microbiota and a need to differentiate the bacteria to the species, subspecies, and even strain levels in order to reveal their true association with feed efficiency. Identification of RFI-associated bacteria provides important leads to manipulate the intestinal microbiota for improving production efficiency, profitability, and sustainability of poultry production.

Indexed as

Feed conversion ratioFeed efficiencyMicrobiotaPoultryResidual feed intake

Identifiers

PMID33573700
PMCPMC7879522
OpenAlexW3127487160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.