ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2021
Barriers to completing colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Effect of Bowel Preparation to Colonoscopy Interval on Preparation Quality and Colonoscopy Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- The COMPLETE-CRC Screening Initiative: Increasing Colonoscopy Completion After Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- The Best Screening Test Is the One That Gets Followed-Up On.Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Understanding the iFOBT-to-Colonoscopy Gap.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- What makes patient navigation work? Identifying functions and forms and conducting causal loop diagramming to specify components of a successful colorectal cancer patient navigation program.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Global, regional and national burden of colon and rectum cancer attributable to high fasting plasma glucose: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prevalence, determinants, and barriers to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test in Qaemshahr, Iran: A population-based cross-sectional study from 2022 to 2023.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Comorbidities and Risk Factors of Patients Diagnosed with CRC after Positive Fecal Test in Real Life.Cancers · 2022Article
- Barriers associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net system: A mixed-methods analysis.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Early detection and treatment are essential. Screening using fecal occult blood tests has increased significantly, but adherence to colonoscopy follow-up is suboptimal, increasing CRC mortality risk. The aim of this study was to identify barriers to colonoscopy following a positive FOBT at the level of the patient, physician, organization and policymakers.
methodsThis mixed methods study was conducted at two health care organizations in Israel. The study included retrospective analyses of 45,281 50-74 year-old members with positive fecal immunochemical tests from 2010 to 2014, and a survey of 772 patients with a positive test during 2015, with and without follow-up. The qualitative part of the study included focus groups with primary physicians and gastroenterologists and in-depth interviews with opinion leaders in healthcare.
resultsPatient lack of comprehension regarding the test was the strongest predictor of non-adherence to follow-up. Older age, Arab ethnicity, and lower socio economic status significantly reduced adherence. We found no correlation with gender, marital status, patient activation, waiting time for appointments or distance from gastroenterology clinics. Primary care physicians underestimate non-adherence rates. They feel responsible for patient follow-up, but express lack of time and skills that will allow them to ensure adherence among their patients. Gastroenterologists do not consider fecal occult blood an effective tool for CRC detection, and believe that all patients should undergo colonoscopy. Opinion leaders in the healthcare field do not prioritize the issue of follow-up after a positive screening test for colorectal cancer, although they understand the importance.
conclusionsWe identified important barriers that need to be addressed to improve the effectiveness of the screening program. Targeted interventions for populations at risk for non-adherence, specifically for those with low literacy levels, and better explanation of the need for follow-up as a routine need to be set in place. Lack of agreement between screening recommendations and gastroenterologist opinion, and lack of awareness among healthcare authority figures negatively impact the screening program need to be addressed at the organizational and national level.
trial registrationThis study was approved by the IRB in both participating organizations (Meuhedet Health Care Institutional Review Board #02-2-5-15, Maccabi Healthcare Institutional Review Board BBI-0025-16). Participant consent was waived by both IRB's.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.