Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573661›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2021

"Running myself ragged": stressors faced by peer workers in overdose response settings.

Zahra Mamdani, Sophie McKenzie, Bernadette Pauly, Fred Cameron, Jennifer Conway-Brown, Denice Edwards, Amy Howell, Tracy Scott, Ryan Seguin, Peter Woodrow and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zahra MamdaniBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Sophie McKenzieBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Bernadette PaulyCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research, STN CSC, University of Victoria, Box 1700, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Fred CameronSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Jennifer Conway-BrownRainCity Housing, 616 Powell St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1H4, Canada.
Denice EdwardsRainCity Housing, 616 Powell St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1H4, Canada.
Amy HowellSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Tracy ScottRainCity Housing, 616 Powell St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1H4, Canada.
Ryan SeguinSOLID Outreach Society, 1056 N Park St, Victoria, BC, V8T 1C6, Canada.
Peter WoodrowRainCity Housing, 616 Powell St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1H4, Canada.
Jane A BuxtonBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada. jane.buxton@bccdc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-393X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer workers or "peers" (workers with past or present drug use experience) are at the forefront of overdose response initiatives, and their role is essential in creating safe spaces for people who use drugs (PWUD). Working in overdose response settings has benefits for peer workers but is also stressful, with lasting emotional and mental health effects. Yet, little is known about the stressors peer workers face and what interventions can be implemented to support them in their roles.

methodsThis project used a community-based sequential mixed-methods research design. Eight peer researcher-led focus groups (n = 31) were conducted between November 2018 and March 2019 to assess needs of peer workers. The transcripts were thematically coded and analysed using interpretative description. These results informed a survey, which was conducted (n = 50) in September 2019 to acquire quantitative data on peer workers' perception of health, quality of life, working conditions and stressors. Frequency distributions were used to describe characteristics of participants. X

resultsFive themes emerged from the focus groups that point to stressors felt by peer workers: (1) financial insecurity; (2) lack of respect and recognition at work; (3) housing challenges; (4) inability to access and/or refer individuals to resources; and (5) constant exposure to death and trauma. Consistent with this, the factors that survey participants picked as one of their "top three stressors" included financial situation, work situation, and housing challenges.

conclusionPeer workers are faced with a diversity of stressors in their lives which often reflect societal stigmatization of drug use. Recognition of these systemic stressors is critical in designing interventions to ease the emotional, physical and financial burden faced by peer workers.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseSubstance-Related DisordersHumansPeer GroupQuality of LifeHarm reductionOverdosePeersPeer workersStigmaStressors

Identifiers

PMID33573661
PMCPMC7877312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.