Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573594›Full record

ArticleEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2021

Peer-led exercise program for ageing adults to improve physical functions - a randomized trial.

D R Bouchard, J V Olthuis, V Bouffard-Levasseur, C Shannon, T McDonald, M Sénéchal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03799952 (A Randomized Control Trial - Zoomers for the Capital Region), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03799952 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Control Trial - Zoomers for the Capital Region: A Peer-Led Exercise Program for Aging Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New BrunswickRan2019 to 2019Enrolled62ConditionsAging, FallArmsZoomers on the Go Exercise Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D R BouchardCardiometabolic Exercise & Lifestyle Laboratory, Fredericton, NB, Canada. Danielle.bouchard@unb.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-7786
J V OlthuisDepartment of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
V Bouffard-LevasseurSecteur Éducation et kinésiologie, Université de Moncton, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
C ShannonFaculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, E3B 4J9, Canada.
T McDonaldFaculty of Law, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
M SénéchalCardiometabolic Exercise & Lifestyle Laboratory, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
University of New Brunswick · CAUniversité de Moncton · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA peer-led exercise program is one way to empower people sharing similar characteristics to encourage others to be active, but there is a lack of evidence that these programs have physical function and other benefits when delivered to ageing adults.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial lasting 12 weeks proposed an exercise peer-led program offered to 31 adults aged 50 and above, twice a week, by a trained leader of the same age from March to May 2019. The program was offered for free with limited space and equipment. Valid tests of physical function (e.g., 30-s chair stand, 6-min walk test) were used to assess the functional benefits. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using self-reported questionnaires and metabolic outcomes via a fasted blood draw.

resultsA significant difference was found between pre-and post-values in most physical function tests in the intervention group (all p < 0.05). When adjusted for potential confounders, the intervention group was significantly associated with a more significant improvement on the chair stand test (ß = .26; p < 0.001; r

conclusionsThe current work suggests that a 12-week peer-led exercise program can improve physical function for adults age 50 and above.

trial registrationNCT03799952 (ClinicalTrials.gov) 12/20/2018.

Indexed as

Ageing adultsExercisePeer-ledPhysical activityPhysical function

Identifiers

PMID33573594
PMCPMC7879524
OpenAlexW3128917403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.