ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2022
Re-Evaluation of Initial Bone Mineralization from an Engineering Perspective.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-Course Evaluation of the In Vivo Resorption Process of Calcium Phosphates/Poly(lactide-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Injectable biomimetic hetero-structured short-fiber microspheres for constructing micro-ossification centers for bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy for quantitative assessment of collagen mineralization: a comparative analytical study.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Behavior of Osteoblastic Lineage Cells When in the Presence of Tamoxifen: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies on Osseointegration.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal analysis of multi-scale cell structure in spheroid culture reveals hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation.Cell and tissue research · 2024Article
- Fabrication of initial trabecular bone-inspired three-dimensional structure with cell membrane nano fragments.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone regeneration was one of the earliest fields to develop in the context of tissue regeneration, and currently, repair of small-sized bone defects has reached a high success rate. Future researches are expected to incorporate more advanced techniques toward achieving rapid bone repair and modulation of the regenerated bone quality. For these purposes, it is important to have a more integrative understanding of the mechanisms of bone formation and maturation from multiple perspectives and to incorporate these new concepts into the development and designing of novel materials and techniques for bone regeneration. This review focuses on the analysis of the earliest stages of bone tissue development from the biology, material science, and engineering perspectives for a more integrative understanding of bone formation and maturation, and for the development of novel biology-based engineering approaches for tissue synthesis
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.