Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573433›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Improvement of RG1-VLP vaccine performance in BALB/c mice by substitution of alhydrogel with the next generation polyphosphazene adjuvant PCEP.

Sarah M Valencia, Athina Zacharia, Alexander Marin, Rebecca L Matthews, Chia-Kuei Wu, Breana Myers, Chelsea Sanders, Simone Difilippantonio, Reinhard Kirnbauer, Richard B Roden and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cyclo- and Polyphosphazenes for Biomedical Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah M ValenciaCancer ImmunoPrevention Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Athina ZachariaCancer ImmunoPrevention Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Alexander MarinInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
Rebecca L MatthewsCancer ImmunoPrevention Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Chia-Kuei WuCancer ImmunoPrevention Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Breana MyersLaboratory Animal Sciences Program, Leidos Biomedical Research Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Chelsea SandersLaboratory Animal Sciences Program, Leidos Biomedical Research Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Simone DifilippantonioLaboratory Animal Sciences Program, Leidos Biomedical Research Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Reinhard KirnbauerLaboratory of Viral Oncology (LVO), Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, EU.
Richard B RodenDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ligia A PintoHPV Immunology Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Robert H ShoemakerChemopreventive Agent Development Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, NCI, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alexander K AndrianovInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jason D MarshallCancer ImmunoPrevention Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7864-803X
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USLeidos (United States) · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USJohns Hopkins University · USMedical University of Vienna · ATPrevention Group · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TZYY-CHOOU WU · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
Mouse modeling of HPV infectionR01CA233486 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUNG, CHIEN-FU, RODEN, RICHARD BRUCE · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Development of Novel Spontaneous HPV Cervicovaginal Carcinoma Models for Cancer ImmunotherapyR01CA237067 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WU, TZYY-CHOOU · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233486NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines provide substantial protection against the most common HPV types responsible for oral and anogenital cancers, but many circulating cancer-causing types remain for which vaccine coverage is lacking. In addition, all current HPV vaccines rely on aluminum salt-based adjuvant formulations that function through unclear mechanisms with few substitutes available. In an effort to expand the toolbox of available adjuvants suitable for HPV vaccines, we compared the immunogenicity of the RG1-VLP (virus-like particle) vaccine in BALB/c mice when formulated with either the aluminum hydroxide adjuvant Alhydrogel or the novel polyphosphazene macromolecular adjuvant poly[di (carboxylatoethylphenoxy) phosphazene] (PCEP). PCEP-formulated RG1-VLPs routinely outperformed VLP/Alhydrogel in several measurements of VLP-specific humoral immunity, including consistent improvements in the magnitude of antibody (Ab) responses to both HPV16-L1 and the L2 RG1 epitope as well as neutralizing titers to HPV16 and cross-neutralization of pseudovirion (PsV) types HPV18 and HPV39. Dose-sparing studies indicated that RG1-VLPs could be reduced in dose by 75% and the presence of PCEP ensured activity comparable to a full VLP dose adjuvanted by Alhydrogel. In addition, levels of HPV16-L1 and -L2-specific Abs were achieved after two vaccinations with PCEP as adjuvant that were equivalent to or greater than levels achieved with three vaccinations with Alhydrogel alone, indicating that the presence of PCEP resulted in accelerated immune responses that could allow for a decreased dose schedule. Given the extensive clinical track record of polyphosphazenes, these data suggest that substitution of alum-based adjuvants with PCEP for the RG1-VLP vaccine could lead to rapid seropositivity requiring fewer boosts, the dose-sparing of commercial VLP-based vaccines, and the establishment of longer-lasting humoral responses to HPV.

Indexed as

Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleAluminum HydroxideAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCapsid ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB COrganophosphorus CompoundsPolymersAluminum HydroxideAntibodies, ViralCapsid ProteinsOncogene Proteins, ViralOrganophosphorus CompoundsPapillomavirus VaccinesPolymerspoly(phosphazene)Vaccines, Virus-Like ParticleadjuvantsHPVHPV-L2Human papillomavirusneutralizing antibodyPCEPpolyphosphazenesprophylactic vaccine

Identifiers

PMID33573433
PMCPMC8475605
OpenAlexW3128882982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.