Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573255›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2021

Epigenetics of Alzheimer's Disease.

Matea Nikolac Perkovic, Alja Videtic Paska, Marcela Konjevod, Katarina Kouter, Dubravka Svob Strac, Gordana Nedic Erjavec, Nela Pivac

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Role of Hydrogen Sulfide (HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Distinct single-nucleus RNA-seq changes among non-neuronal cells in ADNC, LATE-NC, and mixed pathologies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matea Nikolac PerkovicLaboratory for Molecular Neuropsychiatry, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruder Boskovic Institute, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-3113-0778
Alja Videtic PaskaMedical Center for Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-5417
Marcela KonjevodLaboratory for Molecular Neuropsychiatry, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruder Boskovic Institute, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Katarina KouterMedical Center for Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-959X
Dubravka Svob StracLaboratory for Molecular Neuropsychiatry, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruder Boskovic Institute, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-6200-2405
Gordana Nedic ErjavecLaboratory for Molecular Neuropsychiatry, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruder Boskovic Institute, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-9340
Nela PivacLaboratory for Molecular Neuropsychiatry, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruder Boskovic Institute, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ruđer Bošković Institute · HRUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost IP-2019-04-6100Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost Republike Slovenije Programme No. P1-0390, Project No. J3-9293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently no validated biomarkers which can be used to accurately diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD) or to distinguish it from other dementia-causing neuropathologies. Moreover, to date, only symptomatic treatments exist for this progressive neurodegenerative disorder. In the search for new, more reliable biomarkers and potential therapeutic options, epigenetic modifications have emerged as important players in the pathogenesis of AD. The aim of the article was to provide a brief overview of the current knowledge regarding the role of epigenetics (including mitoepigenetics) in AD, and the possibility of applying these advances for future AD therapy. Extensive research has suggested an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation, histone posttranslational modifications, and non-coding RNA regulation (with the emphasis on microRNAs) in the course and development of AD. Recent studies also indicated mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as an interesting biomarker of AD, since dysfunctions in the mitochondria and lower mtDNA copy number have been associated with AD pathophysiology. The current evidence suggests that epigenetic changes can be successfully detected, not only in the central nervous system, but also in the cerebrospinal fluid and on the periphery, contributing further to their potential as both biomarkers and therapeutic targets in AD.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDNA MethylationDNA, MitochondrialHistonesHumansMicroRNAsMitochondriaOdds RatioBiomarkersDNA, MitochondrialHistonesMicroRNAsAlzheimer’s diseaseDNA hydroxymethylationDNA methylationepigeneticshistone modificationsmiRNAmitoepigenetics

Identifiers

PMID33573255
PMCPMC7911414
OpenAlexW3126654127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.