Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573078›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Diagnostic Value of

Hideaki Tsuyoshi, Tetsuya Tsujikawa, Shizuka Yamada, Hidehiko Okazawa, Yoshio Yoshida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic performance of whole-body [European radiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Precision matters: the value of PET/CT and PET/MRI in the clinical management of cervical cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic value ofScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hideaki TsuyoshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-5460
Tetsuya TsujikawaBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8980-1044
Shizuka YamadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6705-1580
Hidehiko OkazawaBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7046-3383
Yoshio YoshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.
University of Fukui · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic potential of PET/MRI with MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-two patients with biopsy-proven primary cervical cancer underwent pretreatment

resultsAccuracy for the invasion of vagina, parametrium, side wall, and adjacent organs was 97.2%, 93.1%, 97.2%, and 100% for

conclusions

Indexed as

18F-FDG PET/MRIcervical cancerCTMRIrevised 2018 FIGO staging

Identifiers

PMID33573078
PMCPMC7912681
OpenAlexW3126409233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.