Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33573045›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

How Enzymes, Proteins, and Antibodies Recognize Extended DNAs; General Regularities.

Georgy A Nevinsky

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georgy A NevinskyInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, 63009 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4988-8923
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-15-00145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray analysis cannot provide quantitative estimates of the relative contribution of non-specific, specific, strong, and weak contacts of extended DNA molecules to their total affinity for enzymes and proteins. The interaction of different enzymes and proteins with long DNA and RNA at the quantitative molecular level can be successfully analyzed using the method of the stepwise increase in ligand complexity (SILC). The present review summarizes the data on stepwise increase in ligand complexity (SILC) analysis of nucleic acid recognition by various enzymes-replication, restriction, integration, topoisomerization, six different repair enzymes (uracil DNA glycosylase, Fpg protein from

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesDeoxyribonuclease EcoRIDNADNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA GlycosylasesDNA HelicasesDNA LigasesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IHumansLactalbuminLactoferrinProteinsRec A RecombinasesSerum Albumin, HumanAntibodiesDeoxyribonuclease EcoRIDNADNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA GlycosylasesDNA HelicasesDNA LigasesDNA Topoisomerases, Type ILactalbuminLactoferrinProteinsRec A RecombinasesSerum Albumin, Humananti-DNA antibodiesdifferent enzymes and proteinsgeneral regularities of DNA recognition

Identifiers

PMID33573045
PMCPMC7866405
OpenAlexW3127906166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.