Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572877›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Knowledge and Perceptions of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Within the UK Adult Population.

Grace Farhat, Fleur Dewison, Leo Stevenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace FarhatSchool of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool L16 9JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7134-7445
Fleur DewisonSchool of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool L16 9JD, UK.
Leo StevensonSchool of Health Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool L16 9JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8136-1857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are popular sugar substitutes that can help in weight and diabetes management, but concerns regarding their use have been raised by the public. This study aimed to investigate knowledge, benefits and safety perceptions of NNS in a sample of UK adults. The impact of knowledge dissemination on the change in perceptions was also examined. An online survey was distributed through social media platforms and UK Universities and was completed by 1589 participants aged 18 years and above. Results showed a high-risk perception of NNS and a lack of knowledge in regulations in nearly half the population sample. The artificial attributes of NNS further limited their acceptance. Risk perception has been significantly linked to a lower consumption of sweeteners (

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Risk BehaviorsNon-Nutritive SweetenersAdolescentAdultDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultNon-Nutritive Sweetenerscancer riskconsumer perceptiondiabetesfood safetylow-calorie sweetenersnon-nutritive sweetenersweight control

Identifiers

PMID33572877
PMCPMC7911612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.