Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572864›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Canine Blood Group Prevalence and Geographical Distribution around the World: An Updated Systematic Review.

Sara Mangiaterra, Giacomo Rossi, Maria Teresa Antognoni, Matteo Cerquetella, Andrea Marchegiani, Arianna Miglio, Alessandra Gavazza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Omics Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: Literature Review and Perspectives in Transfusion Medicine.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara MangiaterraSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.
Giacomo RossiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-5984
Maria Teresa AntognoniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Blood Bank and Transfusion Unit EMOVET-UNIPG, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Matteo CerquetellaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9471-0756
Andrea MarchegianiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3629-0391
Arianna MiglioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Blood Bank and Transfusion Unit EMOVET-UNIPG, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5459-6298
Alessandra GavazzaSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2070-8028
Università di Camerino · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, blood transfusions have been more commonly given to pets. The importance of determining blood groups in dogs and cats is, therefore, well-known for reducing the risk of adverse reactions in the recipient blood caused by a "non-compatible" donor. This systematic review summarizes data from previously published reports and follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified 41 eligible studies using different states and blood-typing methods to determine blood groups in dogs. The dog blood groups that were identified between 1999 and 2020 in 17 different countries were combined to yield the DEA (Dog Erythrocyte Antigen), Kai, and Dal groups. These studies were conducted in Europe, America, Africa, and Asia but not in all the countries of these continents. The methods used to determine blood types have also changed over the years. This systematic review highlights gaps in the literature and should advance future studies synthesizing data with methodological rigor.

Indexed as

blood-typing assaycanine blood groupscountriesprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33572864
PMCPMC7912425
OpenAlexW3128458595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.