Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572827›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Systematic Review Protocol to Identify the Key Benefits and Efficacy of Nature-Based Learning in Outdoor Educational Settings.

Jeff Mann, Tonia Gray, Son Truong, Pasi Sahlberg, Peter Bentsen, Rowena Passy, Susanna Ho, Kumara Ward, Rachel Cowper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeff MannCentre for Educational Research, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia.
Tonia GrayCentre for Educational Research, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-1748
Son TruongFaculty of Health, School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4548-2977
Pasi SahlbergGonski Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3319-7578
Peter BentsenCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-6779
Rowena PassyPlymouth Institute of Education, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4367-6604
Susanna HoSingapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494, Singapore.
Kumara WardSchool of Education and Social Work, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
Rachel CowperThrive Outdoors, Edinburgh EH11 3AF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outdoor Learning in natural environments is a burgeoning approach in the educational sector. However, the evidence-base of research has not kept pace with teacher perceptions and increased practitioner usage. Anecdotal evidence and formal research suggest the significant health and wellbeing benefits of nature connection. Offering low-cost, non-invasive pedagogical solutions to public health challenges-particularly around mental health, wellbeing, physical literacy, and increasing physical activity-the pedagogical benefits of Outdoor Learning are yet to be fully enunciated. The proposed systematic review will search for studies across eight academic databases which measure the academic and socio-emotional benefits of Outdoor Learning, with a focus on school-aged educational settings. Using the inclusion criteria set out in this paper (and registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020153171), relevant studies will be identified then summarised to provide a synthesis of the current literature on Outdoor Learning. The goal of this review is to document the widespread international investigation into Outdoor Learning and its associated benefits for development, wellbeing, and personal growth. The systematic review will provide insights for teacher-training institutions, educational policy makers, and frontline teachers to improve the learning experiences of future students.

Indexed as

LearningMental HealthChildExerciseHumansSchoolsStudentsSystematic Reviews as Topichealthnatural environmentsOutdoor Learningprotocolsocio-emotionalsystematic reviewwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33572827
PMCPMC7908363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.