Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572635›Full record

ArticleToxics2021

Cytotoxicity of Seaweed Compounds, Alone or Combined to Reference Drugs, against Breast Cell Lines Cultured in 2D and 3D.

Fernanda Malhão, Alice Abreu Ramos, Ana Catarina Macedo, Eduardo Rocha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fucoidan fromMarine drugs · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pro-Apoptotic Activity and Cell Cycle Arrest ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Brown MacroalgaeMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cytotoxicity andHeliyon · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernanda MalhãoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto (U.Porto), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4978-5358
Alice Abreu RamosInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto (U.Porto), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Ana Catarina MacedoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto (U.Porto), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3533-7343
Eduardo RochaInstitute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto (U.Porto), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-4389
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDP/04423/2020ICBAS - University of Porto Doctoral Program in Biomedical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweed bioactive compounds have shown anticancer activities in in vitro and in vivo studies. However, tests remain limited, with conflicting results, and effects in combination with anticancer drugs are even scarcer. Here, the cytotoxic effects of five seaweed compounds (astaxanthin, fucoidan, fucosterol, laminarin, and phloroglucinol) were tested alone and in combination with anticancer drugs (cisplatin-Cis; and doxorubicin-Dox), in breast cell lines (three breast cancer (BC) subtypes and one non-tumoral). The combinations revealed situations where seaweed compounds presented potentiation or inhibition of the drugs' cytotoxicity, without a specific pattern, varying according to the cell line, concentration used for the combination, and drug. Fucosterol was the most promising compound, since: (i) it alone had the highest cytotoxicity at low concentrations against the BC lines without affecting the non-tumoral line; and (ii) in combination (at non-cytotoxic concentration), it potentiated Dox cytotoxicity in the triple-negative BC cell line. Using a comparative approach, monolayer versus 3D cultures, further investigation assessed effects on cell viability and proliferation, morphology, and immunocytochemistry targets. The cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects in monolayer were not observed in 3D, corroborating that cells in 3D culture are more resistant to treatments, and reinforcing the use of more complex models for drug screening and a multi-approach that should include histological and ICC analysis.

Indexed as

breast cancercombinatory therapydrug screeningin vitromulticellular aggregates

Identifiers

PMID33572635
PMCPMC7912033
OpenAlexW3128577114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.