ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Systematic Comparison of Depth Map Representations for Face Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Homomorphic Filtering and Phase-Based Matching for Cross-Spectral Cross-Distance Face Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Computer Vision for 3D Perception and Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Thermal Face Verification through Identification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, we are witnessing the wide diffusion of active depth sensors. However, the generalization capabilities and performance of the deep face recognition approaches that are based on depth data are hindered by the different sensor technologies and the currently available depth-based datasets, which are limited in size and acquired through the same device. In this paper, we present an analysis on the use of depth maps, as obtained by active depth sensors and deep neural architectures for the face recognition task. We compare different depth data representations (depth and normal images, voxels, point clouds), deep models (two-dimensional and three-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks, PointNet-based networks), and pre-processing and normalization techniques in order to determine the configuration that maximizes the recognition accuracy and is capable of generalizing better on unseen data and novel acquisition settings. Extensive intra- and cross-dataset experiments, which were performed on four public databases, suggest that representations and methods that are based on normal images and point clouds perform and generalize better than other 2D and 3D alternatives. Moreover, we propose a novel challenging dataset, namely MultiSFace, in order to specifically analyze the influence of the depth map quality and the acquisition distance on the face recognition accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.