Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572578›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Vasoactive-Inotropic Score as an Early Predictor of Mortality in Adult Patients with Sepsis.

Juhyun Song, Hanjin Cho, Dae Won Park, Sungwoo Moon, Joo Yeong Kim, Sejoong Ahn, Seong-Geun Lee, Jonghak Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juhyun SongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6217-7360
Hanjin ChoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-304X
Dae Won ParkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Sungwoo MoonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Joo Yeong KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Sejoong AhnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6003-2552
Seong-Geun LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-2576
Jonghak ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9481-6358

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1C1C1010362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vasoactive and inotropic medications are essential for sepsis management; however, the association between the maximum Vasoactive-Inotropic score (VISmax) and clinical outcomes is unknown in adult patients with sepsis. We investigated the VISmax as a predictor for mortality among such patients in the emergency department (ED) and compared its prognostic value with that of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. This single-center retrospective study included 910 patients diagnosed with sepsis between January 2016 and March 2020. We calculated the VISmax using the highest doses of vasopressors and inotropes administered during the first 6 h on ED admission and categorized it as 0-5, 6-15, 16-30, 31-45, and >45 points. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. VISmax for 30-day mortality was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. The mortality rates in the five VISmax groups were 17.2%, 20.8%, 33.3%, 54.6%, and 70.0%, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of VISmax to predict 30-day mortality was 31. VISmax had better prognostic value than the cardiovascular component of the SOFA score and initial lactate levels. VISmax was comparable to the APACHE II score in predicting 30-day mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that VISmax 16-30, 31-45, and >45 were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. VISmax in ED could help clinicians to identify sepsis patients with poor prognosis.

Indexed as

inotropesmortalitysepsisseptic shockvasopressors

Identifiers

PMID33572578
PMCPMC7867010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.