Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572369›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Diagnosing Burn Wounds Infection: The Practice Gap & Advances with MolecuLight Bacterial Imaging.

Nawras Farhan, Steven Jeffery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bacteriophage therapy reducesAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  9. Wound Dressing Modifications for Accelerated Healing of Infected Wounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Infection and Burn Injury.European burn journal · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nawras FarhanBurn Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK.
Steven JefferyWound Healing Practice Development Unit, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6587-5412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injuries constitute a critical economic burden on healthcare infrastructures worldwide. They are often associated with high mortality rates due to severe complications. Infection is the most common complication, highlighting the importance of prompt and precise diagnosis in order to prevent detrimental consequences and to optimize patient outcomes. Here we examine the current standard of care for diagnosing infection in both burn and chronic wounds followed by an investigation into the research surrounding a relatively new technique for bacterial detection, fluorescence imaging. With five years of published research on bacterial fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight

Indexed as

bacteriaburnsfluorescenceimagingMolecuLight i:Xwounds

Identifiers

PMID33572369
PMCPMC7916143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.