Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572323›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Estimating Similarity of Dose-Response Relationships in Phase I Clinical Trials-Case Study in Bridging Data Package.

Adrien Ollier, Sarah Zohar, Satoshi Morita, Moreno Ursino

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrien OllierINSERM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, USPC, Université de Paris, F-75006 Paris, France.
Sarah ZoharINSERM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, USPC, Université de Paris, F-75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-2340
Satoshi MoritaDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4344-3317
Moreno UrsinoINSERM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, USPC, Université de Paris, F-75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5709-4322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bridging studies are designed to fill the gap between two populations in terms of clinical trial data, such as toxicity, efficacy, comorbidities and doses. According to ICH-E5 guidelines, clinical data can be extrapolated from one region to another if dose-reponse curves are similar between two populations. For instance, in Japan, Phase I clinical trials are often repeated due to this physiological/metabolic paradigm: the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for Japanese patients is assumed to be lower than that for Caucasian patients, but not necessarily for all molecules. Therefore, proposing a statistical tool evaluating the similarity between two populations dose-response curves is of most interest. The aim of our work is to propose several indicators to evaluate the distance and the similarity of dose-toxicity curves and MTD distributions at the end of some of the Phase I trials, conducted on two populations or regions. For this purpose, we extended and adapted the commensurability criterion, initially proposed by Ollier et al. (2019), in the setting of completed phase I clinical trials. We evaluated their performance using three synthetic sets, built as examples, and six case studies found in the literature. Visualization plots and guidelines on the way to interpret the results are proposed.

Indexed as

Research DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansJapanMaximum Tolerated Dosebayesian inferencebridging studiesdistribution distancedose-findingdose–responseoncologyphase I

Identifiers

PMID33572323
PMCPMC7916097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.