Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572318›Full record

ArticleMembranes2021

Bone Regeneration Assessment of Polycaprolactone Membrane on Critical-Size Defects in Rat Calvaria.

Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi, Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli, Tamires Mello Francatti, Ana Carulina Rezende de Moares Ferreira, Járede Carvalho Pereira, Hesham Mohammed Al-Sharani, Flavia de Almeida Lucas, Leonardo Perez Faverani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Rapid and Convenient Approach to Construct Porous Collagen MembranesFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Paula Farnezi BassiDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0031-4953
Vinícius Ferreira BizelliDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Tamires Mello FrancattiDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Ana Carulina Rezende de Moares FerreiraDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Járede Carvalho PereiraDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.
Hesham Mohammed Al-SharaniSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-2408
Flavia de Almeida LucasAraçatuba Veterinary Medicine School, UNESP-São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16050-680, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-8528
Leonardo Perez FaveraniDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015-050, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-3048

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/24360-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials for use in guided bone regeneration (GBR) are constantly being investigated and developed to improve clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the biological performance of different membranes during the bone healing process of 8 mm critical defects in rat calvaria in order to assess their influence on the quality of the newly formed bone. Seventy-two adult male rats were divided into three experimental groups (n = 24) based on the membranes used: the CG-membrane-free control group (only blood clot, negative control), BG-porcine collagen membrane group (Bio-Guide

Indexed as

bone regenerationbone substitutematerials biocompatibilitymaterials testingmembranespolycaprolactonepolymers

Identifiers

PMID33572318
PMCPMC7916152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.