Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33572249›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data.

Eduardo Gomes, Luciano Bertini, Wagner Rangel Campos, Ana Paula Sobral, Izabela Mocaiber, Alessandro Copetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eduardo GomesComputer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
Luciano BertiniComputer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7360-6685
Wagner Rangel CamposComputer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
Ana Paula SobralProduction Engineering Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
Izabela MocaiberNatural Sciences Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
Alessandro CopettiComputer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0559-9038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigated the potential advantage of coupling activity and intensity, namely, Activity-Intensity, in accelerometer data to improve the description of daily activities of individuals. We further tested two alternatives for supervised classification. In the first alternative, the activity and intensity are inferred together by applying a single classifier algorithm. In the other alternative, the activity and intensity are classified separately. In both cases, the algorithms used for classification are k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF). The results showed the viability of the classification with good accuracy for Activity-Intensity recognition. The best approach was KNN implemented in the single classifier alternative, which resulted in 79% of accuracy. Using two classifiers, the result was 97% accuracy for activity recognition (Random Forest), and 80% for intensity recognition (KNN), which resulted in 78% for activity-intensity coupled. These findings have potential applications to improve the contextualized evaluation of movement by health professionals in the form of a decision system with expert rules.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAlgorithmsMachine LearningHumansSupport Vector Machineaccelerometersactivity and intensity recognitionmachine learningmobile computingpervasive healthcare monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33572249
PMCPMC7915619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.