Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33571849›Full record

ArticleResearch in developmental disabilities2021

The future of General Movement Assessment: The role of computer vision and machine learning - A scoping review.

Nelson Silva, Dajie Zhang, Tomas Kulvicius, Alexander Gail, Carla Barreiros, Stefanie Lindstaedt, Marc Kraft, Sven Bölte, Luise Poustka, Karin Nielsen-Saines and 3 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Research in developmental disabilities, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Automated Framework for Pose-Sequence Analysis of Spontaneous Movements in Preterm Infants.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nelson SilvaiDN - Interdisciplinary Developmental Neuroscience, Division of Phoniatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Know-Center GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Dajie ZhangiDN - Interdisciplinary Developmental Neuroscience, Division of Phoniatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
Tomas KulviciusDepartment for Computational Neuroscience, Third Institute of Physics-Biophysics, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Alexander GailLeibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany; German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Carla BarreirosKnow-Center GmbH, Graz, Austria; Institute of Interactive Systems and Data Science, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Stefanie LindstaedtKnow-Center GmbH, Graz, Austria; Institute of Interactive Systems and Data Science, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Marc KraftDepartment of Medical Engineering, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sven BölteCenter of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden; Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Luise PoustkaChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany.
Karin Nielsen-SainesDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, USA.
Florentin WörgötterLeibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany; Department for Computational Neuroscience, Third Institute of Physics-Biophysics, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Institute of Physics, Department for Computational Neuroscience at the Bernstein Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Christa EinspieleriDN - Interdisciplinary Developmental Neuroscience, Division of Phoniatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Peter B MarschikiDN - Interdisciplinary Developmental Neuroscience, Division of Phoniatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Leibniz-ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany; Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: peter.marschik@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

Genetic evolution, pathogenesis and immune responses in mother to child transmission of ZIKVR01AI140718 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHENG, GENHONG, JUNG, JAE U · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical and scientific value of Prechtl general movement assessment (GMA) has been increasingly recognised, which has extended beyond the detection of cerebral palsy throughout the years. With advancing computer science, a surging interest in developing automated GMA emerges.

aimsIn this scoping review, we focused on video-based approaches, since it remains authentic to the non-intrusive principle of the classic GMA. Specifically, we aimed to provide an overview of recent video-based approaches targeting GMs; identify their techniques for movement detection and classification; examine if the technological solutions conform to the fundamental concepts of GMA; and discuss the challenges of developing automated GMA. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We performed a systematic search for computer vision-based studies on GMs. OUTCOMES AND

resultsWe identified 40 peer-reviewed articles, most (n = 30) were published between 2017 and 2020. A wide variety of sensing, tracking, detection, and classification tools for computer vision-based GMA were found. Only a small portion of these studies applied deep learning approaches. A comprehensive comparison between data acquisition and sensing setups across the reviewed studies, highlighting limitations and advantages of each modality in performing automated GMA is provided. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A "method-of-choice" for automated GMA does not exist. Besides creating large datasets, understanding the fundamental concepts and prerequisites of GMA is necessary for developing automated solutions. Future research shall look beyond the narrow field of detecting cerebral palsy and open up to the full potential of applying GMA to enable an even broader application.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyMovementComputersHumansMachine LearningNeurologic ExaminationAugmented general movement assessmentAutomationCerebral palsyComputer visionDeep learningDevelopmental disorderEarly detectionGeneral movementsInfancyMachine learningNeurodevelopmentPose estimation

Identifiers

PMID33571849
PMCPMC7910279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.