ArticleJournal of affective disorders2021
Comments to Drs. Bahji, Vazquez, and Zarate.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Expert opinion on drug safety · 2022Pooled it
- The antidepressant effect and safety of non-intranasal esketamine: A systematic review.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2022Pooled it
- My Cosmos: development, clinical protocol, and preliminary usability of a gamified transdiagnostic digital CBT platform.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Mechanism of Ketamine in Suicidal Behavior Based on Animal Models of Aggressiveness and Impulsivity: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the absence of head-to-head studies directly comparing the efficacy of intranasal esketamine to that of intravenous ketamine, valid conclusions regarding comparative efficacy cannot be made based on the existing data from trials using markedly differing study designs and patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33571795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.