Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33571369›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of nutrition2021

Adequacy of Nutrient Intakes of Severely and Acutely Malnourished Children Treated with Different Doses of Ready-To-Use Therapeutic Food in Burkina Faso.

Victor Nikièma, Suvi T Kangas, Cécile Salpéteur, Abdoulaye Ouédraogo, Carl Lachat, Nestor H I Bassolé, Nadia F Fogny

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Victor NikièmaNutrition and Health Department, Action contre la Faim, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Suvi T KangasExpertise and Advocacy Department, Action contre la Faim, Paris, France.
Cécile SalpéteurExpertise and Advocacy Department, Action contre la Faim, Paris, France.
Abdoulaye OuédraogoFood Security and Livelihoods Department, Action contre la Faim, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Carl LachatDepartment of Food Technology, Safety, and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium.
Nestor H I BassoléDepartment of Biochemistry and microbiology, Joseph KI-ZERBO University, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Nadia F FognySchool of Nutrition and Food Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin.
Action Contre la Faim · FRGhent University · BEGroupe de Recherche et d’Action sur le Foncier · BFUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi · BJUniversité Joseph Ki-Zerbo · BF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReady-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) are designed to cover the daily nutrient requirements of children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM). However, with the transfer of uncomplicated SAM care from the hospital environment to the community level, children will be able to consume complementary and family foods (CFF) in addition to RUTF, and this might decrease the quantity of RUTF needed for recovery.

objectivesUsing an individually randomized clinical trial, we investigated the effects of a reduced RUTF dose on the daily energy and macronutrient intakes, the proportion of energy coming from CFF, and the mean probability of adequacy (MPA) of intake in 11 micronutrients of 516 children aged 6-59 mo who were treated for SAM in Burkina Faso.

methodsThe data were collected using a single 24-h multipass dietary recall, 1 mo after starting treatment, from December 2016 to August 2018, repeated on a subsample of 66 children. Differences between children receiving the reduced RUTF (intervention arm) and those receiving standard RUTF (control arm) were assessed by linear mixed models.

resultsDaily energy intake was lower (P < 0.01) in the intervention arm (mean ± SD 1321 ± 339 kcal) than in the control arm (1467 ± 319 kcal). CFF contributed to 40% of the daily energy intake in the intervention and 35% in the control arm. The MPA for 11 micronutrients was 0.89 ± 0.1 in the intervention arm and 0.95 ± 0.07 in the control arm (P = 0.06).

conclusionsReducing the dose of RUTF during SAM treatment had a negative impact on daily energy intake of the children. Despite this, children covered their recommended energy intake. The energy intake coming from CFF was similar between arms, suggesting that children's feeding practices did not change due to the reduction in RUTF in this context. This trial was registered at the IRSCTN registry as ISRCTN50039021.

Indexed as

EatingFood, FortifiedBurkina FasoChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolEnergy IntakeFast FoodsFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicronutrientsNutrientsNutritional RequirementsSevere Acute MalnutritionMicronutrientsNutrientsBurkina Fasochildren with severe acute malnutritioncomplementary feedingenergy and micronutrient adequacyready-to-use therapeutic food

Identifiers

PMID33571369
PMCPMC8030704
OpenAlexW3127463345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.