Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33571286›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Lactic acid-containing products for bacterial vaginosis and their impact on the vaginal microbiota: A systematic review.

Erica L Plummer, Catriona S Bradshaw, Michelle Doyle, Christopher K Fairley, Gerald L Murray, Deborah Bateson, Lindi Masson, Josephine Slifirski, Gilda Tachedjian, Lenka A Vodstrcil

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effect of Exogenous Sex Steroids on the Vaginal Microbiota: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Progress in interventions for vaginal microecology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Erica L PlummerCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5710-2671
Catriona S BradshawCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle DoyleMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Hospital, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher K FairleyCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gerald L MurrayWomen's Centre for Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3330-4433
Deborah BatesonFamily Planning New South Wales, Ashfield, New South Wales, Australia.
Lindi MassonCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Josephine SlifirskiMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Hospital, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Gilda TachedjianBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lenka A VodstrcilCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3679-9195
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUBurnet Institute · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe vaginal microbiota in bacterial vaginosis (BV) typically has low abundance of lactic acid producing lactobacilli. Lactic acid has properties that may make it effective for treating BV and/or restoring an optimal lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiota. We conducted a systematic review to describe the effect of intravaginal lactic acid-containing products on BV cure, and their impact on vaginal microbiota composition (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018115982).

methodsPubMed, Embase and OVID were searched from inception to November 2019 to identify eligible studies. Included studies evaluated an intravaginal lactic acid-containing product and reported BV cure using established diagnostic methods, and/or vaginal microbiota composition using molecular methods. Studies were independently screened and assessed, and the proportion of women cured post-treatment was calculated. Study results were described in a qualitative manner.

resultsWe identified 1,883 articles and assessed 57 full-texts for eligibility. Seven different lactic acid-containing products were evaluated and differed with respect to excipients, lactic acid concentration and pH. Most studies had medium or high risk of bias. Three trials compared the efficacy of a lactic acid-containing product to metronidazole for BV cure. One study found lactic acid to be equivalent to metronidazole and two studies found lactic acid to be significantly inferior to metronidazole. Two studies included a control group receiving a placebo or no treatment. One reported lactic acid to be superior than no treatment and the other reported lactic acid to be equivalent to placebo. Lactic acid-containing products did not significantly impact the vaginal microbiota composition.

conclusionThere is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the use of lactic acid-containing products for BV cure or vaginal microbiota modulation. However, adequately powered and rigorous randomised trials with accompanying vaginal microbiota data are needed to evaluate the efficacy of lactic acid as a BV treatment strategy.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAdministration, IntravaginalFemaleHumansLactic AcidPublication BiasRiskVaginaVaginosis, BacterialLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID33571286
PMCPMC7877752
OpenAlexW3126395207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.