Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33571249›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Financial implications of New York City's weight management initiative.

Sagun Agrawal, Alexis C Wojtanowski, Laura Tringali, Gary D Foster, Eric A Finkelstein

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Privacy Concerns in Group Format Lifestyle Interventions for Obesity.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sagun AgrawalProgram in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7898-3663
Alexis C WojtanowskiWW International (formerly Weight Watchers), New York, NY, United States of America.
Laura TringaliWW International (formerly Weight Watchers), New York, NY, United States of America.
Gary D FosterWW International (formerly Weight Watchers), New York, NY, United States of America.
Eric A FinkelsteinProgram in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6443-9686
World Water Watch · USDuke-NUS Medical School · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo estimate potential annual savings in medical expenditures from a subsidized weight management program from the NYC Government perspective.

designLongitudinal observational study.

settingEmployees of New York City (NYC) government and enrolled dependents. SAMPLE: 14,946 participants with overweight and obesity.

interventionWW (formerly Weight Watchers®) 'Workshop' and 'Digital' programs. MEASURES: Participation rate, enrollment duration, weight change, and predicted gross and net total and per capita medical expenditure savings and return on investment (ROI). ANALYSIS: Participation rate, enrollment duration, weight change, and program costs are based on direct observation. Predicted savings are simulated based on published data relating weight loss to medical expenditure reductions.

resultsIn total, 47% of participating employees and 50% of participating dependents lost weight during the enrollment period. Mean (median) enrollment duration for employees was 7.1 months (7.0) and for dependents was 6.9 months (6.0). Mean (median) weight losses for the employees in 'Workshops' and 'Digital' was 6.6 lbs (2.80) and 6.3 lbs (0.0). For dependents, weight losses were 7.4 lbs (3.59) and 11.6 lbs (2.0). Per capita and total predicted net savings to NYC Government from employees was estimated to be $120 and $1,486,102 for an ROI of 143%. Including dependents, predicted net savings increases to $1,963,431 for an ROI of 189%. Over 80% of savings came from participants in the Obese III category.

conclusionAn evidence-based weight management program has the potential to generate a positive ROI for employers. Future studies should validate these estimates using actual data and more rigorous designs.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFinancing, GovernmentHealth Planning SupportHealth PromotionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityObesityOverweightTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33571249
PMCPMC7877753
OpenAlexW3128152560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.