Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33571221›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Assessment of breast cancer surgical margins with multimodal optical microscopy: A feasibility clinical study.

Mark T Scimone, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Gopi Maguluri, Dorin Preda, Jesung Park, John Grimble, Min Song, Kechen Ban, Nicusor Iftimia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Accuracy of Ex-vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Margin Assessment of Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark T ScimonePhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0123-3765
Savitri KrishnamurthyDepartment of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Gopi MaguluriPhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.
Dorin PredaPhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.
Jesung ParkPhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.
John GrimblePhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.
Min SongPhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.
Kechen BanPhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.
Nicusor IftimiaPhysical Sciences Inc, Andover, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7713-6972

Funding

Multimodal microscope for intraoperative assessment of breast surgical marginsR44CA173998 · NCI · PHYSICAL SCIENCES, INC · PI IFTIMIA, NICUSOR · 2017 to 2018
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA173998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing surgical margin information during breast cancer surgery is crucial for the success of the procedure. The margin is defined as the distance from the tumor to the cut surface of the resection specimen. The consensus among surgeons and radiation oncologists is that there should be no tumor left within 1 to maximum 2 mm from the surface of the surgical specimen. If a positive margin remains, there is substantial risk for tumor recurrence, which may also result in potentially reduced cosmesis and eventual need for mastectomy. In this paper we report a novel multimodal optical imaging instrument based on combined high-resolution confocal microscopy-optical coherence tomography imaging for assessing the presence of potential positive margins on surgical specimens. Since rapid specimen analysis is critical during surgery, this instrument also includes a fluorescence imaging channel to enable rapid identification of the areas of the specimen that have potential positive margins. This is possible by specimen incubation with a cancer specific agent prior to imaging. In this study we used a quenched contrast agent, which is activated by cancer specific enzymes, such as urokinase plasminogen activators (uPA). Using this agent or a similar one, one may limit the use of high-resolution optical imaging to only fluorescence-highlighted areas for visualizing tissue morphology at the sub-cellular scale and confirming or ruling out cancer presence. Preliminary evaluation of this technology was performed on 20 surgical specimens and testing of the optical imaging findings was performed against histopathology. The combination of the three imaging modes allowed for high correlation between optical image analysis and histological ground-truth. The initial results are encouraging, showing instrument capability to assess margins on clinical specimens with a positive predictive value of 1.0 and a negative predictive value of 0.83.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMargins of ExcisionMicroscopy, ConfocalOptical ImagingBreastFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID33571221
PMCPMC7877783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.