ArticlePloS one2021
Tracking individual honeybees among wildflower clusters with computer vision-facilitated pollinator monitoring.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inspection of pollination transfer and success in coffee flowering detection using intersection over union based cascade RCNN in a vision environment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Digital Monitoring and Modeling of Honey Bee Foraging on Clover Flowers Under Heat Stress.microPublication biology · 2026Article
- Successes and limitations of pretrained YOLO detectors applied to unseen time-lapse images for automated pollinator monitoring.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Revealing complex mosquito behaviour: a review of current automated video tracking systems suitable for tracking mosquitoes in the field.Parasites & vectors · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- YOLO object detection models can locate and classify broad groups of flower-visiting arthropods in images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Object Detection of Small Insects in Time-Lapse Camera Recordings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detecting common coccinellids found in sorghum using deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CATER: Combined Animal Tracking & Environment Reconstruction.Science advances · 2023Article
- A mixed model of heat exchange in stationary honeybee foragers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Camera traps are an effective tool for monitoring insect-plant interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- The role of food odor in invertebrate foraging.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2022Review
- Article
- Application of YOLOv4 for Detection and Motion Monitoring of Red Foxes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Visual Diagnosis of the Varroa Destructor Parasitic Mite in Honeybees Using Object Detector Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring animals in their natural habitat is essential for advancement of animal behavioural studies, especially in pollination studies. Non-invasive techniques are preferred for these purposes as they reduce opportunities for research apparatus to interfere with behaviour. One potentially valuable approach is image-based tracking. However, the complexity of tracking unmarked wild animals using video is challenging in uncontrolled outdoor environments. Out-of-the-box algorithms currently present several problems in this context that can compromise accuracy, especially in cases of occlusion in a 3D environment. To address the issue, we present a novel hybrid detection and tracking algorithm to monitor unmarked insects outdoors. Our software can detect an insect, identify when a tracked insect becomes occluded from view and when it re-emerges, determine when an insect exits the camera field of view, and our software assembles a series of insect locations into a coherent trajectory. The insect detecting component of the software uses background subtraction and deep learning-based detection together to accurately and efficiently locate the insect among a cluster of wildflowers. We applied our method to track honeybees foraging outdoors using a new dataset that includes complex background detail, wind-blown foliage, and insects moving into and out of occlusion beneath leaves and among three-dimensional plant structures. We evaluated our software against human observations and previous techniques. It tracked honeybees at a rate of 86.6% on our dataset, 43% higher than the computationally more expensive, standalone deep learning model YOLOv2. We illustrate the value of our approach to quantify fine-scale foraging of honeybees. The ability to track unmarked insect pollinators in this way will help researchers better understand pollination ecology. The increased efficiency of our hybrid approach paves the way for the application of deep learning-based techniques to animal tracking in real-time using low-powered devices suitable for continuous monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.