Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33571034›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

Low-dose CT urography using deep learning image reconstruction: a prospective study for comparison with conventional CT urography.

Yannan Cheng, Yangyang Han, Jianying Li, Ganglian Fan, Le Cao, Junjun Li, Xiaoqian Jia, Jian Yang, Jianxin Guo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yannan ChengDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
Yangyang HanDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
Jianying LiGE Healthcare, Computed Tomography Research Center, Beijing, 100176, PR China.
Ganglian FanDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
Le CaoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
Junjun LiDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
Xiaoqian JiaDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
Jian YangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
Jianxin GuoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi province, PR China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the image quality of low-dose CT urography (LD-CTU) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with conventional CTU (C-CTU) using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V).

methodsThis was a prospective, single-institutional study using the excretory phase CTU images for analysis. Patients were assigned to the LD-DLIR group (100kV and automatic mA modulation for noise index (NI) of 23) and C-ASIR-V group (100kV and NI of 10) according to the scan protocols in the excretory phase. Two radiologists independently assessed the overall image quality, artifacts, noise and sharpness of urinary tracts. Additionally, the mean CT attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) in the urinary tracts were evaluated.

results26 patients each were included in the LD-DLIR group (10 males and 16 females; mean age: 57.23 years, range: 33-76 years) and C-ASIR-V group (14 males and 12 females; mean age: 60 years, range: 33-77 years). LD-DLIR group used a significantly lower effective radiation dose compared with the C-ASIR-V group (2.01 ± 0.44 mSv

conclusionIt is feasibility to provide comparable image quality while reducing 71% radiation dose in low-dose CTU with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm compared to the conventional CTU with ASIR-V. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: (1) CT urography with deep learning reconstruction algorithm can reduce the radiation dose by 71% while still maintaining image quality.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiation DosageAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary TractUrographyUrologic Diseases

Identifiers

PMID33571034
PMCPMC8010546
OpenAlexW3128404502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.