Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33571005›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2021

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncologists: Results of an International Study.

Abdul Rahman Jazieh, Anelisa K Coutinho, Assia A Bensalem, Abdullah A Alsharm, Hassan Errihani, Layth Mula-Hussain, Sana Al-Sukhun, Carlos A Sampaio-Filho, Ola M R Khorshid, Roselle B De Guzman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Abdul Rahman JaziehDepartment of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Anelisa K CoutinhoClínica AMO, Salvador, Brazil.
Assia A BensalemMedical Oncology Department, Établissement Hospitalier DIDOUCHE Mourad, Constantine, Algeria.
Abdullah A AlsharmKing Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan ErrihaniNational Institute of Oncology, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Layth Mula-HussainRadiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sana Al-SukhunAl-Hyatt Oncology Practice, Amman, Jordan.
Carlos A Sampaio-FilhoClínica AMO, Salvador, Brazil.
Ola M R KhorshidNCI Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Roselle B De GuzmanManila Central University-FDTMF Hospital, Caloocan City, Philippines.
Mohammad O AlkaiyatDepartment of Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hoda A JradiKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hospital Ana Nery · BRCairo University · EGCentre Hospitalo-Universitaire Dr Benbadis Constantine · DZKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAManila Central University · PHMohammed V University · MAResearch Network (United States) · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs frontline workers facing the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers should be well-prepared to fight the disease and prevent harm to their patients and themselves. Our study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of oncologists in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on them.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated questionnaire disseminated to oncologists by SurveyMonkey. The tool had 42 questions that captured participants' knowledge, attitude, and practice; their experiences; and the pandemic's impact on various aspects of their lives. Participants from Middle East and North African countries, Brazil, and the Philippines completed the electronic survey between April 24 and May 15, 2020.

resultsOf the 1,010 physicians who participated in the study, 54.75% were male and 64.95% were medical or clinical oncologists. The level of knowledge regarding the prevention and transmission of the virus was good in 52% of participants. The majority (92%) were worried about contracting the virus either extremely (30%) or mildly (62%), and 84.85% were worried about transmitting the virus to their families. Approximately 76.93% reported they would take the COVID 19 vaccine once available, with oncologists practicing in Brazil having the highest odds ratio of intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine (odds ratio, 11.8, 95% CI, 5.96 to 23.38,

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has adverse effects on various personal and professional aspects of oncologists' lives. Interventions should be implemented to mitigate the negative impact and prepare oncologists to manage future crises with more efficiency and resilience.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAfrica, NorthernBrazilCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle EastOncologistsPandemicsPhilippinesPractice Patterns, Physicians'SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33571005
PMCPMC8081523
OpenAlexW3129102933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.