ArticleSurgery today2021
Clinical significance of surgical intervention for imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Article in Surgery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive performance of [Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- [Surgical and interdisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImatinib is the standard treatment for unresectable and metastatic GIST. In the late stages, patients undergoing imatinib show drug resistance. Surgical intervention has been occasionally performed for resistant lesions. However, the clinical significance of such intervention remains unclear.
methodsBetween 2006 and 2015, 37 patients were diagnosed with imatinib-resistant GISTs. We performed surgical intervention only for localized resistant lesions. We retrospectively investigated the background characteristics, data on surgical intervention and subsequent treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
resultsEighteen patients diagnosed with localized resistance received surgical intervention (S-group) and 19 patients diagnosed with generalized resistance were received other TKIs (M-group). In S-group, no serious complications occurred, and all patients restarted imatinib after resection. The median PFS was 14.5 months. Five patients underwent surgical intervention multiple times followed by the continuation of imatinib, and the median duration of imatinib continuation was 22.2 months. Second-line TKIs were administered to 93% of the patients and the dose-intensity and outcome were similar in both groups. The median OS was 47.2 months after surgery.
conclusionsSurgical intervention could be performed safely and therefore could be followed by the continuation of TKI therapy. Surgical intervention based on the appropriate criteria of resistance might thus be useful for imatinib-resistant GISTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.