Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33570633›Full record

SynthesisBlood advances2021

A systematic review of antithrombotic treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Eva N Hamulyák, Joost G Daams, Frank W G Leebeek, Bart J Biemond, Peter A W Te Boekhorst, Saskia Middeldorp, Mandy N Lauw

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trousseau syndrome: management of refractory VTE.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva N HamulyákDepartment of Vascular Medicine and.
Joost G DaamsMedical Library, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank W G LeebeekDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and.
Bart J BiemondDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter A W Te BoekhorstDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC) Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and.
Saskia MiddeldorpDepartment of Vascular Medicine and.
Mandy N LauwDepartment of Vascular Medicine and.
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis, have an increased risk of thrombosis. Risk of recurrent thrombosis can be reduced with antithrombotic therapy and/or cytoreduction, but the optimal long-term management in patients with MPN with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown, and clinical practice is heterogeneous. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies evaluating anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy, with or without cytoreduction, in MPN patients with a history of VTE. A total of 5675 unique citations were screened for eligibility. No randomized trials were identified. Ten observational studies involving 1295 patients with MPN were included in the analysis. Overall, 23% had an arterial or recurrent venous thrombotic event on follow-up. The recurrence risk was lowest for patients on oral anticoagulation plus cytoreduction (16%); 55 of 313 (18%) with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and 5 of 63 (8%) with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). In 746 analyzed patients, the risk of recurrent VTE ranged up to 33% (median 13%) and was low in 63 DOAC plus cytoreduction-treated patients (3.2%). All types of antithrombotic treatments were associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE when combined with cytoreduction. Most studies had a high risk of bias, whereas clinical and statistical heterogeneity led to inconsistent and imprecise findings. In summary, evidence on the optimal antithrombotic treatment of VTE in patients with MPN is based on observational studies only with low certainty for all strategies. Our data suggest that a combination of anticoagulation and cytoreduction may provide the lowest recurrence risk.

Indexed as

Myeloproliferative DisordersNeoplasmsThrombosisVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic AgentsHumansAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33570633
PMCPMC7805324
OpenAlexW3120435160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.