Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33570270›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Intervention and efficacy of advance care planning for patients in intensive care units and their families: a scoping review protocol.

Kanako Yamamoto, Junko Hayama, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Yuki Yonekura, Erika Ota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Survey of Clinicians Regarding Goals of Care for Patients with Severe Comorbid Illnesses Hospitalized for an Acute Deterioration.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kanako YamamotoGraduate School of Nursing Science, Nursing Infomatix, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5809-9996
Junko HayamaGraduate School of Nursing Science, Nursing Infomatix, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro NakayamaGraduate School of Nursing Science, Nursing Infomatix, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki YonekuraGraduate School of Nursing Science, Nursing Infomatix, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Erika OtaGraduate School of Nursing Science, Global Health Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis scoping review aims to elucidate the effectiveness of advance care planning interventions for patients entering the intensive care unit and their families.

designScoping review of relevant literature from January 2000-March 2020.

methodsThis review includes studies undertaken in intensive care units that focus on patients older than 18 years or their families. The review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-P guideline. The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, BNI, PsycINFO and ICHUSHI databases and the Cochrane Library will be searched for both published and unpublished articles. Two independent reviewers will examine the list of remaining titles and summarize and identify articles that meet the inclusion criteria.

resultsIt has long been taboo to consider end-of-life care when in intensive care unit. However, promoting advance care planning, even in patients who are in the intensive care unit, is important and it may help support the patient's need for autonomy.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningTerminal CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsScoping Reviews as Topicadvance care planningcritical careintensive carenursesnursingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33570270
PMCPMC7877163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.