ArticleACR open rheumatology2021
Postapproval Comparative Safety Study of Tofacitinib and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 5-Year Results from a United States-Based Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of the Incidence and Influencing Factors of Malignant Tumors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of cancer risks associated with JAK inhibitors and TNF inhibitors treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world cohort studies.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Safety of JAK Inhibitors vs TNF Antagonists in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Herpes zoster in patients with inflammatory arthritides or ulcerative colitis treated with tofacitinib, baricitinib or upadacitinib: a systematic review of clinical trials and real-world studies.Rheumatology international · 2023Pooled it
- Cardiovascular and mortality outcomes with JAK versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a target trial emulation (CARDINAL-RA).Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor KL130008 in active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the open-label, randomised controlled ORAL Surveillance trial.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2022Trial
- Tofacitinib and Risk of Malignancy: Results From the Safety of Tofacitinib in Routine Care Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (STAR-RA) Study.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Trial
- Tofacitinib and risk of cardiovascular outcomes: results from the Safety of TofAcitinib in Routine care patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (STAR-RA) study.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2022Trial
- Article
- Comparative Safety Analysis of Targeted Synthetic and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Article
- Trajectory of lipid profiles in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tofacitinib: Evidence from the prospective CENTRA cohort.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Observational
- The risk of venous thromboembolism in RA.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Compared to Other Disease-Modifying Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- The Impact of PRAC EMA/AIFA Recommendations on the Prescriptions of JAKi and b-DMARDs: Preliminary Results of the Survey from 21 Rheumatological Italian Centers Affiliated with CReI.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- From concept to practice: real-world safety of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- JAK inhibitors and adverse cardiovascular events: Class effect or molecule-specific risk?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Immunosuppressants/Immunomodulators and Malignancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared 5-year adverse event (AE) incidence rates (IRs) between patients initiating tofacitinib and those initiating new biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) within the United States (US) Corrona RA registry.
methodsIRs (number of first events/100 patient-years) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious infection events (SIEs), herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies, and death were estimated among tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators, regardless of dose/schedule, between November 6, 2012 (US Food and Drug Administration tofacitinib approval), and July 31, 2018 (follow-up through January 31, 2019). Propensity score (PS) methods were used to control for nonrandom prescribing practices. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare rates using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. Different risk windows were used for acute (MACE, SIEs, HZ, and venous thromboembolic events [VTEs]) and long-term (malignancy and death) events. VTEs were assessed descriptively.
resultsFor MACE, SIEs, and HZ, 1999 (3152.1 patient-years) and 8358 (12 869.4 years) tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators were included, respectively; for malignancy/death, 1999 (4505.6 patient-years) and 6354 (16 670.8 patient-years) initiators were included, respectively. AE rates were similar across cohorts, except for HZ, which was significantly higher with tofacitinib versus bDMARDs (PS-trimmed adjusted HR 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-3.75). There were 45 (zero serious) and 88 (five serious) HZ events with tofacitinib and bDMARDs, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar results. VTE IRs (95% CI) were 0.29 (0.13-0.54) and 0.33 (0.24-0.45) for tofacitinib and bDMARDs, respectively.
conclusionIn this registry analysis, both cohorts had similar MACE, SIE, malignancy, death, and VTE rates; HZ rates were higher for tofacitinib initaitors than for bDMARD initiators.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.