Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33570148›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Machine learning-based outcome prediction and novel hypotheses generation for substance use disorder treatment.

Murtaza Nasir, Nichalin S Summerfield, Asil Oztekin, Margaret Knight, Leland K Ackerson, Stephanie Carreiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Murtaza NasirDepartment of Operations and Information Systems, Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Nichalin S SummerfieldDepartment of Operations and Information Systems, Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Asil OztekinDepartment of Operations and Information Systems, Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Margaret KnightSusan and Alan Solomont School of Nursing, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Leland K AckersonDepartment of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Stephanie CarreiroDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, UMass Memorial Healthcare, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSubstance use disorder is a critical public health issue. Discovering the synergies among factors impacting treatment program success can help governments and treatment facilities develop effective policies. In this work, we propose a novel data analytics approach using machine learning models to discover interaction effects that might be neglected by traditional hypothesis-generating approaches. MATERIALS AND

methodsA patient-episode-level substance use treatment discharge dataset and a Federal Bureau of Investigation crime dataset were joined using core-based statistical area codes. Random forests, artificial neural networks, and extreme gradient boosting were applied with a nested cross-validation methodology. Interaction effects were identified based on the machine learning model with the best performance. These interaction effects were analyzed and tested using traditional logistic regression models on unseen data.

resultsIn predicting patient completion of a treatment program, extreme gradient boosting performed the best with an area under the curve of 89.31%. Based on our procedure, 73 interaction effects were identified. Among these, 14 were tested using traditional logistic regression models where 12 were statistically significant (P<.05).

conclusionsWe identified new interaction effects among the length of stay, frequency of substance use, changes in self-help group attendance frequency, and other factors. This work provides insights into the interactions between factors impacting treatment completion. Further traditional statistical analysis can be employed by practitioners and policy makers to test the effects discovered by our novel machine learning approach.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSubstance-Related DisordersHumansLogistic ModelsNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosishealthcare analyticshypothesis generationmachine learningsubstance-related disorderstreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33570148
PMCPMC8661425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.