Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33570124›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2021

Deep Learning-Based Image Classification in Differentiating Tufted Astrocytes, Astrocytic Plaques, and Neuritic Plaques.

Shunsuke Koga, Nikhil B Ghayal, Dennis W Dickson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Digital neuropathology of neurodegenerative disorders: Foundations, research advances, and future directions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Comparison of multiple quantitative strategies for neuropathologic image analyses.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shunsuke KogaFrom the Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Nikhil B GhayalFrom the Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Dennis W DicksonFrom the Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Neuropathology CoreP50NS072187 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI DICKSON, DENNIS WILLIAM · 2010 to 2017
$8.7M
Project 2: Identifying genes and Pathways that impact Tau Toxicity in FTDU54NS100693 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI PETRUCELLI, LEONARD · 2016 to 2020
$6.2M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS072187NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based image classification model that can differentiate tufted astrocytes (TA), astrocytic plaques (AP), and neuritic plaques (NP) based on images of tissue sections stained with phospho-tau immunohistochemistry. Phospho-tau-immunostained slides from the motor cortex were scanned at 20× magnification. An automated deep learning platform, Google AutoML, was used to create a model for distinguishing TA in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) from AP in corticobasal degeneration (CBD) and NP in Alzheimer disease (AD). A total of 1500 images of representative tau lesions were captured from 35 PSP, 27 CBD, and 33 AD patients. Of those, 1332 images were used for training, and 168 images for cross-validation. We tested the model using 100 additional test images taken from 20 patients of each disease. In cross-validation, precision and recall for each individual lesion type were 100% and 98.0% for TA, 98.5% and 98.5% for AP, and 98.0% and 100% for NP, respectively. In a test set, all images of TA and NP were correctly predicted. Only eleven images of AP were predicted to be TA or NP. Our data indicate the potential usefulness of deep learning-based image classification methods to assist in differential diagnosis of tauopathies.

Indexed as

AstrocytesDeep LearningHumansPlaque, AmyloidProof of Concept StudyAlzheimer diseaseCorticobasal degenerationDeep learningMachine learningProgressive supranuclear palsy

Identifiers

PMID33570124
PMCPMC7985829
OpenAlexW3128351807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.