Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33570017›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2021

Human perceptual learning is delayed by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor partial agonist D-cycloserine.

Harriet Dempsey-Jones, Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen, Michael Browning, Tamar R Makin, Marcella L Woud, Catherine J Harmer, Juergen Margraf, Andrea Reinecke

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Harriet Dempsey-JonesWellcome Centre for Integrated Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9360-7842
Susann Steudte-SchmiedgenDepartment of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael BrowningDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tamar R MakinWellcome Centre for Integrated Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Marcella L WoudDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Catherine J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Juergen MargrafDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andrea ReineckeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBRuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBTechnische Universität Dresden · DEThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104128/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimisation of learning has long been a focus of scientific research, particularly in relation to improving psychological treatment and recovery of brain function. Previously, partial N-methyl-D-aspartate agonists have been shown to augment reward learning, procedural learning and psychological therapy, but many studies also report no impact of these compounds on the same processes.

aimsHere we investigate whether administration of an N-methyl-D-aspartate partial agonist (D-cycloserine) modulates a previously unexplored process - tactile perceptual learning. Further, we use a longitudinal design to investigate whether N-methyl-D-aspartate-related learning effects vary with time, thereby providing a potentially simple explanation for apparent mixed effects in previous research.

methodsThirty-four volunteers were randomised to receive one dose of 250 mg D-cycloserine or placebo 2 h before tactile sensitivity training. Tactile perception was measured using psychophysical methods before and after training, and 24/48 h later.

resultsThe placebo group showed immediate within-day tactile perception gains, but no further improvements between-days. In contrast, tactile perception remained at baseline on day one in the D-cycloserine group (no within-day learning), but showed significant overnight gains on day two. Both groups were equivalent in tactile perception by the final testing - indicating N-methyl-D-aspartate effects changed the timing, but not the overall amount of tactile learning.

conclusionsIn sum, we provide first evidence for modulation of perceptual learning by administration of a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate agonist. Resolving how the effects of such compounds become apparent over time will assist the optimisation of testing schedules, and may help resolve discrepancies across the learning and cognition domains.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCognitionCycloserineDouble-Blind MethodDrug Partial AgonismFemaleHumansLearningLongitudinal StudiesMaleReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTime FactorsTouch PerceptionYoung AdultCycloserineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartatecognitive enhancementN-methyl-D-aspartatepsychophysicssomatosensory plasticitytouch perception

Identifiers

PMID33570017
PMCPMC7924109
OpenAlexW3127246424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.