Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569930›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology2021

Automated Bone Age Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Bone Age Assessment.

Byoung Dai Lee, Mu Sook Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Artificial intelligence algorithm for bone age estimation].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Automatic bone age assessment: a Turkish population study.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Article
  11. Objective Assessment of Bone Age in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Byoung Dai LeeDivision of Computer Science and Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4028-6168
Mu Sook LeeDepartment of Radiology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea. musuki.lee@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0382-5564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone age assessments are a complicated and lengthy process, which are prone to inter- and intra-observer variabilities. Despite the great demand for fully automated systems, developing an accurate and robust bone age assessment solution has remained challenging. The rapidly evolving deep learning technology has shown promising results in automated bone age assessment. In this review article, we will provide information regarding the history of automated bone age assessments, discuss the current status, and present a literature review, as well as the future directions of artificial intelligence-based bone age assessments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAge Determination by SkeletonAutomationHandHumansNeural Networks, ComputerWristArtificial intelligenceBone age assessmentConvolutional neural networkDeep learningLeft hand and wrist radiographs

Identifiers

PMID33569930
PMCPMC8076828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.