ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021
Subjective and Objective Assessment of Monoenergetic and Polyenergetic Images Acquired by Dual-Energy CT in Breast Cancer.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-DECT image-based intra- and peritumoral interpretable radiomics and artificial intelligence models for preoperative prediction of pathological grading of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Lesion conspicuity assessment of prone 40-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging in arterial-phase photon-counting CT for breast cancer: a retrospective comparison with DCE-MRI.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Dual-energy computed tomography with new virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction enhances prostate lesion image quality and improves the diagnostic efficacy for prostate cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Evaluations of the diagnostic performance of ZOOMit diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging for breast lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Thoracic Diseases: Technique and Applications of Dual-Energy CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A semiautomated radiomics model based on multimodal dual-layer spectral CT for preoperative discrimination of the invasiveness of pulmonary ground-glass nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Evaluation of optimal monoenergetic images acquired by dual-energy CT in the diagnosis of T staging of thoracic esophageal cancer.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Diagnostic value of dual-energy CT and clinicopathological and imaging feature analysis of mixed endometrial stromal and smooth muscle tumors with intracardiac extension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo objectively and subjectively assess and compare the characteristics of monoenergetic images [MEI (+)] and polyenergetic images (PEI) acquired by dual-energy CT (DECT) of patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study evaluated the images and data of 42 patients with breast cancer who had undergone dual-phase contrast-enhanced DECT from June to September 2019. One standard PEI, five MEI (+) in 10-kiloelectron volt (keV) intervals (range, 40-80 keV), iodine density (ID) maps, iodine overlay images, and Z effective (Z
resultsLow keV MEI (+) at 40-50 keV showed increased CNR and SNR
conclusionCompared with PEI, MEI (+) reconstructions at low keV in the venous phase acquired by DECT improved the objective and subjective assessment of lesion conspicuity in patients with malignant breast lesions. MEI (+) reconstruction acquired by DECT may be helpful for the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.