ArticleNursing open2021
Treatment withdrawal of the patient on end of life: An analysis of values, ethics and guidelines in palliative care.
Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relevance of clinical ethics support services in specialized outpatient palliative care teams and inpatient hospices.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Exploring Factors Influencing Decisions to Withdraw Treatment in Iranian Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026Article
- Treatment withdrawal of the patient on end of life: An analysis of values, ethics and guidelines in palliative care.Nursing open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimFamily surrogate decision-making during the later stage of a patient's life may sometimes result in conflict and emotional distress among the parties involved. The present article aims to promote ethical end-of-life decision-making among healthcare professionals in a view to eliminating any misunderstanding that may arise while meeting the care needs of the patient.
designA case study involving a request for treatment withdrawal by the family of a patient on end of life.
methodsThis paper draws upon a scenario encountered during practice to analyse the moral commitments in delivering high-quality end-of-life care with much emphasis on pre-existing palliative care guidelines for adults.
resultsHealthcare professionals are bound by the principle of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice. Although the use of guidelines may be tenable, decisions often take into consideration the patient's choice and then weighed against the moral values of healthcare specialists and those required in the profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.