Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569769›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical investigation2021

MR-proADM as marker of endotheliitis predicts COVID-19 severity.

Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo, María Dolores Calvo Nieves, María Dolores Rodríguez Mulero, Ismael Calcerrada Alises, Marta Hernández Olivo, Wysali Trapiello Fernández, Mercedes González Morales, Cristina Bolado Jiménez, María Dolores Albaladejo-Otón, Hilda Fernández Ovalle and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luis García de Guadiana-RomualdoLaboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3028-3198
María Dolores Calvo NievesLaboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.
María Dolores Rodríguez MuleroIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.
Ismael Calcerrada AlisesPrimary Care Medina del Campo Urbano, Medina del Campo, Valladolid, Spain.
Marta Hernández OlivoPneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.
Wysali Trapiello FernándezLaboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.
Mercedes González MoralesLaboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.
Cristina Bolado JiménezEmergency Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.
María Dolores Albaladejo-OtónLaboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.
Hilda Fernández OvallePrimary Care Valladolid West Area, Centro de Salud Parque Alameda-Covaresa, Valladolid, Spain.
Andrés Conesa HernándezEmergency Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.
Eugenio Azpeleta ManriqueEmergency Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.
Luciano Consuegra-SánchezCardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.
Leonor Nogales MartínIntensive Care Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.
Pablo Conesa ZamoraLaboratory Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.
David Andaluz-OjedaIntensive Care Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.
Santa Lucía University General Hospital · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESFundación Medina · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León GRS COVID 108/A/20Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM) PMAFI-COVID19/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of patients at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19 constituted an unsolved challenge. Although growing evidence demonstrates a direct association between endotheliitis and severe COVID-19, the role of endothelial damage biomarkers has been scarcely studied. We investigated the relationship between circulating mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) levels, a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction, and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.

methodsProspective observational study enrolling adult patients with confirmed COVID-19. On admission to emergency department, a blood sample was drawn for laboratory test analysis. Primary and secondary endpoints were 28-day all-cause mortality and severe COVID-19 progression. Area under the curve (AUC) and multivariate regression analysis were employed to assess the association of the biomarker with the established endpoints.

resultsA total of 99 patients were enrolled. During hospitalization, 25 (25.3%) cases progressed to severe disease and the 28-day mortality rate was of 14.1%. MR-proADM showed the highest AUC to predict 28-day mortality (0.905; [CI] 95%: 0.829-0.955; P < .001) and progression to severe disease (0.829; [CI] 95%: 0.740-0.897; P < .001), respectively. MR-proADM plasma levels above optimal cut-off (1.01 nmol/L) showed the strongest independent association with 28-day mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 10.470, 95% CI: 2.066-53.049; P < .005) and with progression to severe disease (HR: 6.803, 95% CI: 1.458-31.750; P = .015).

conclusionMid-regional proadrenomedullin was the biomarker with highest performance for prognosis of death and progression to severe disease in COVID-19 patients and represents a promising predictor for both outcomes, which might constitute a potential tool in the assessment of prognosis in early stages of this disease.

Indexed as

MortalityAdrenomedullinAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveCause of DeathCOVID-19Disease ProgressionEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansInflammationIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsAdrenomedullinmid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, humanPeptide FragmentsProtein PrecursorsCOVID-19endotheliitismid-regional proadrenomedullinprognosisSARS-CoV-2severity

Identifiers

PMID33569769
PMCPMC7995076
OpenAlexW3128307020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.