Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569753›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2021

High-resolution anoscopy, is there a benefit in proceeding directly to the operating room?

B Moeckli, J Canner, A Najafian, S Carbunaru, N Cowell, C Atallah, E Paredes, A Chudnovets, S H Fang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B MoeckliDepartment of Surgery, Ravitch Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, High Resolution Anoscopy Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9020-8416
J CannerDepartment of Surgery, Ravitch Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, High Resolution Anoscopy Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
A NajafianDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
S CarbunaruNorthwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
N CowellDepartment of Surgery, Ravitch Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, High Resolution Anoscopy Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
C AtallahDepartment of Surgery, Ravitch Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, High Resolution Anoscopy Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
E ParedesDepartment of Surgery, Ravitch Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, High Resolution Anoscopy Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
A ChudnovetsDepartment of Surgery, Ravitch Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, High Resolution Anoscopy Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
S H FangDepartment of Surgery, Ravitch Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, High Resolution Anoscopy Clinic, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. sfang7@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) has advanced our ability to detect anal dysplasia. Historically, HRA is performed in a clinical setting and subsequent ablation is performed in the clinical setting or operating room. The aim of this study was to determine the most effective venue for the performance of HRA.

methodsFollowing institutional review board (IRB) approval, the correlation between anal cytology and HRA performed in the clinic versus in the operating room was evaluated. Data were extracted from our IRB-approved prospective HRA database over the time period of 2013-2017.

resultsOne hundred twenty-eight HRAs were compared (101 in the clinical setting, 27 in the operating room). There was a statistically significant difference in the correlation between anal cytology and HRA pathology for procedures performed in the clinical setting (55% [56/101]) versus those performed in the operating room (82% [22/27]) (p = 0.014). More biopsies were obtained in the operating room than in the clinic setting (3 vs. 1, p < 0.0001). The majority of patients who had HRA in a clinical setting with subsequent HRA in the operating room stated that they preferred to have their HRAs performed in the operating room due to discomfort from the HRA procedure.

conclusionsDetection rates for anal dysplasia on HRA, are significantly higher when performed in the operating room. To prevent discomfort in the clinical setting, patients with high-grade dysplasia on anal pap testing may benefit from proceeding directly to the operating room for concurrent HRA and ablation.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsOperating RoomsAnal CanalHumansProctoscopyProspective StudiesAnal cancerAnal pap smearHigh-grade dysplasiaHigh-resolution anoscopyPatient comfort

Identifiers

PMID33569753
PMCPMC8016767
OpenAlexW3126210484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.