Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569705›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2021

Predicting blood-to-plasma concentration ratios of drugs from chemical structures and volumes of distribution in humans.

Hideaki Mamada, Kazuhiko Iwamoto, Yukihiro Nomura, Yoshihiro Uesawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hideaki MamadaDepartment of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1Kiyose-shi, Tokyo, 204-858, Noshio, Japan.
Kazuhiko IwamotoDrug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Japan Tobacco Inc, 1-1, Murasaki-cho, Takatsuki, 569-1125, Osaka, Japan.
Yukihiro NomuraDrug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Japan Tobacco Inc, 1-1, Murasaki-cho, Takatsuki, 569-1125, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshihiro UesawaDepartment of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1Kiyose-shi, Tokyo, 204-858, Noshio, Japan. uesawa@my-pharm.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-991X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their importance in determining the dosing regimen of drugs in the clinic, only a few studies have investigated methods for predicting blood-to-plasma concentration ratios (Rb). This study established an Rb prediction model incorporating typical human pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters. Experimental Rb values were compiled for 289 compounds, offering reliable predictions by expanding the applicability domain. Notably, it is the largest list of Rb values reported so far. Subsequently, human PK parameters calculated from plasma drug concentrations, including the volume of distribution (Vd), clearance, mean residence time, and plasma protein binding rate, as well as 2702 kinds of molecular descriptors, were used to construct quantitative structure-PK relationship models for Rb. Among the evaluated PK parameters, logVd correlated best with Rb (correlation coefficient of 0.47). Thus, in addition to molecular descriptors selected by XGBoost, logVd was employed to construct the prediction models. Among the analyzed algorithms, artificial neural networks gave the best results. Following optimization using six molecular descriptors and logVd, the model exhibited a correlation coefficient of 0.64 and a root-mean-square error of 0.205, which were superior to those previously reported for other Rb prediction methods. Since Vd values and chemical structures are known for most medications, the Rb prediction model described herein is expected to be valuable in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalMolecular StructurePharmacokineticsTissue DistributionAlgorithmsDatabases, PharmaceuticalDrug MonitoringHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPharmaceutical PreparationsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipStructure-Activity RelationshipPharmaceutical PreparationsArtificial neural networksBlood-to-plasma ratioPharmacokineticsQuantitative structure–pharmacokinetic relationshipsVolume of distribution

Identifiers

PMID33569705
PMCPMC8342319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.