Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569674›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

The mediating effect of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice in the relationship of pain on health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Laurence Leysen, Wilfried Cools, Jo Nijs, Nele Adriaenssens, Roselien Pas, C Paul van Wilgen, Rinske Bults, Eva Roose, Astrid Lahousse, David Beckwée

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Perceived injustice and its impact on psychological distress in cancer patients and survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laurence LeysenPain in Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium. laurence.leysen@vub.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-7002
Wilfried CoolsInterfaculty Center Data Processing and Statistics, Brussels Health Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
Jo NijsPain in Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.
Nele AdriaenssensDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Building F-kine, Laarbeeklaan 103, BE-1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Roselien PasPain in Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.
C Paul van WilgenPain in Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.
Rinske BultsPain in Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.
Eva RoosePain in Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.
Astrid LahoussePain in Motion International Research Group, http://www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium.
David BeckwéeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Building F-kine, Laarbeeklaan 103, BE-1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEStatistics Belgium · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of cognitive appraisals in the effectiveness of pain coping is well established. Two key variables in these appraisal processes are pain catastrophizing (PC) and perceived injustice (PI), which are known to increase the risk of long-term disability and aggravate the pain-related distress through maladaptive behavioral responses. However, to date, the mediating effects of these appraisals have not been examined concurrently in the breast cancer survivor (BCS) population, nor have they been related to health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

methodsUsing cross-sectional data from 110 BCS, structural path analyses were used to examine the mediating effects of PC and PI in the relationship of pain on the HRQoL in BCS.

resultsResults demonstrated a significant direct effect of pain and PI on HRQoL combined with a significant indirect effect through PI, but not through PC. An increase in pain is suggested to result in a decrease in quality of life. On the other hand, an increase in pain also is suggested to increase the PI. A similar relation with PC was not retained as significant.

conclusionThe relative salience of PI as a mediator of HRQoL underscores the fact that PI is not only understudied but also underappreciated and undertreated in the BCS population. The results of our study warrant replication across longitudinal studies but continue to expand upon the evidence of the multifactorial nature of pain coping in BCS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCatastrophizationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPainQuality of LifeBreast cancer survivorsPainPain catastrophizingPerceived injusticeQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID33569674
OpenAlexW3126672725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.