Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569662›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Diagnosis of celiac disease is being missed in over 80% of children particularly in those from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds.

Jessica Whitburn, Srinivasa R Rao, Siba Prosad Paul, Bhupinder Kaur Sandhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Developing a Measure to Assess General Knowledge for Coeliac Disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Celiac Disease in Children: A 2023 Update.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Population level screening for celiac disease: is now the time?Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica WhitburnNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Srinivasa R RaoNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Siba Prosad PaulDepartment of Pediatrics, Yeovil District Hospital, Level 10, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, BA21 4AT, UK. siba@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-1269
Bhupinder Kaur SandhuDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK.
University of Oxford · GBBristol Royal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-based screening studies have documented prevalence of celiac disease (CD) at 1% at age 7 years, but 90% of children remain undiagnosed. This prospective cohort study aims to examine whether observed differences in diagnosis rates of CD exist between children from different socioeconomic groups and how this has changed over a 12-year period. All children aged ≤15 years with a postcode within South West of England (SWE) diagnosed with CD during a 12-year period (1999-2010) when all diagnoses were based on endoscopic histology were included in the study. The incidence rates in socioeconomic groups were determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation Score and Office of National Statistics population data. Four hundred fifteen children were diagnosed with CD; 65 within the City of Bristol (CoB). Diagnosis rate rose 4.2 times in SWE and 3.1 times in CoB between the first and last 4 years of the study. The rate was 1.6 times higher in the least socioeconomically deprived compared to most deprived (2.2 times in CoB), and the gap widened over the 12 years. Missed cases estimates for CoB and SWE are at least 83% and 91%, respectively.Conclusion: These findings suggest that while incidence of diagnosed CD in children has increased over a 12-year period, 83-91% remained undiagnosed. Socioeconomically deprived children are more likely to be underdiagnosed, and the gap between the least and most deprived has widened. To fully address massive underdiagnosis, further strategies including pilot studies using finger prick serological mass screening for CD in children entering primary schools are needed. What is Known: • Epidemiological studies record a 1% prevalence of celiac disease (CD), but up to 90% of children may remain undiagnosed. • Previous studies have documented an increased incidence of CD in higher socioeconomic groups, but proposed reasons remain conflicting. What is New: • Incidence of diagnosed CDhas gone up across all social classes but more so in higher socioeconomic groups and there is an increasing health/wealth gap. • This study estimates that 83-91% of children with CD are still being missed despite improved and easily available serological testing and suggest that population screening should be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseChildEnglandHumansIncidencePrevalenceProspective StudiesBiopsyCeliac diseaseChildHealth/wealth gapMissed diagnosisSocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID33569662
OpenAlexW3126516629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.