ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021
Diagnosis of celiac disease is being missed in over 80% of children particularly in those from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mass Screening Strategies for Celiac Disease in Apparently Healthy Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Pooled it
- Developing a Measure to Assess General Knowledge for Coeliac Disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Gaps and Disparities in Celiac Disease Screening: A Nationwide Analysis of a High-Risk Pediatric Population.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Challenges in the Pediatric Celiac Disease Diagnosis: An Up-to-Date Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Living with Pediatric Coeliac Disease: Lessons for Health Service Delivery.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Celiac Disease in Children: A 2023 Update.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Rapid Anti-tTG-IgA Screening Test for Early Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Pediatric Populations.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Population level screening for celiac disease: is now the time?Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Celiac Disease and Cardiovascular Risk: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Coeliac Disease Case-Control Study: Has the Time Come to Explore beyond Patients at Risk?Nutrients · 2023Article
- Reliability of the Multiplex CytoBead CeliAK Immunoassay to Assess Anti-tTG IgA for Celiac Disease Screening.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population-based screening studies have documented prevalence of celiac disease (CD) at 1% at age 7 years, but 90% of children remain undiagnosed. This prospective cohort study aims to examine whether observed differences in diagnosis rates of CD exist between children from different socioeconomic groups and how this has changed over a 12-year period. All children aged ≤15 years with a postcode within South West of England (SWE) diagnosed with CD during a 12-year period (1999-2010) when all diagnoses were based on endoscopic histology were included in the study. The incidence rates in socioeconomic groups were determined using the Index of Multiple Deprivation Score and Office of National Statistics population data. Four hundred fifteen children were diagnosed with CD; 65 within the City of Bristol (CoB). Diagnosis rate rose 4.2 times in SWE and 3.1 times in CoB between the first and last 4 years of the study. The rate was 1.6 times higher in the least socioeconomically deprived compared to most deprived (2.2 times in CoB), and the gap widened over the 12 years. Missed cases estimates for CoB and SWE are at least 83% and 91%, respectively.Conclusion: These findings suggest that while incidence of diagnosed CD in children has increased over a 12-year period, 83-91% remained undiagnosed. Socioeconomically deprived children are more likely to be underdiagnosed, and the gap between the least and most deprived has widened. To fully address massive underdiagnosis, further strategies including pilot studies using finger prick serological mass screening for CD in children entering primary schools are needed. What is Known: • Epidemiological studies record a 1% prevalence of celiac disease (CD), but up to 90% of children may remain undiagnosed. • Previous studies have documented an increased incidence of CD in higher socioeconomic groups, but proposed reasons remain conflicting. What is New: • Incidence of diagnosed CDhas gone up across all social classes but more so in higher socioeconomic groups and there is an increasing health/wealth gap. • This study estimates that 83-91% of children with CD are still being missed despite improved and easily available serological testing and suggest that population screening should be reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.