ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021
Uterine angiomyolipoma: a clinical analysis of 8 cases and literature review.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Massive uterine angiomyolipoma mimicking uterine leiomyoma in a 49-year-old woman.Qatar medical journal · 2026Article
- Uterine Angioleiomyoma: Clinical and Histopathologic Differentiation of an Underrecognized Mimicker of Uterine Leiomyoma.International journal of surgical pathology · 2025Article
- Adipocytes in the Uterine Wall during Experimental Healing and in Cesarean Scars during Pregnancy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUterine angiomyolipoma (AML) is a rare condition involving benign tumors composed of varying proportions of blood vessels, fat, and epithelioid or spindled smooth muscle cells. We analyzed the clinicopathological features, diagnosis and treatment methods, and prognosis of uterine AML.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical-pathological data of eight patients with pathologically diagnosed uterine AML at a single center from January 2008 to July 2020.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 50 years (range, 41-62). One patient was asymptomatic; the main clinical manifestations of the others included vaginal bleeding (3), menorrhagia (2), abdominal pain (1), and dysmenorrhea with adenomyosis (1). In one case, fat components observed via abdominal computed tomography led to a diagnosis of uterine leiomyolipoma; the rest were diagnosed as uterine leiomyoma (4), uterine fibroid degeneration (2), and pelvic mass (1). The lesions were in the body of the uterus (6), the fundus of the uterus (1), and the broad ligament (1). Seven patients had a focal soft tumor texture, and one had a tough texture; the lesions were yellow (3), yellow-white (3), and pinkish white (2). Surgeries included transabdominal myomectomy (2), transabdominal hysterectomy (2), transabdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (2), and laparoscopic total hysterectomy/bilateral salpingectomy (2). The median follow-up time was 72 months. No relapses were reported.
conclusionUterine AML has a low incidence rate and is most likely to occur in perimenopausal women. The clinical manifestations are similar to those of uterine leiomyomas, but AML should be suspected if the internal echo of the uterine tumor is uneven and contains adipose tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.