ArticleMachine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop)2020
Unsupervised Learning for Spherical Surface Registration.
Article in Machine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinally consistent registration and parcellation of cortical surfaces using semi-supervised learning.Medical image analysis · 2024Article
- Learning 4D Infant Cortical Surface Atlas with Unsupervised Spherical Networks.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted InterventionArticle
- A Deep Network for Joint Registration and Parcellation of Cortical Surfaces.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted InterventionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current spherical surface registration methods achieve good performance on alignment and spatial normalization of cortical surfaces across individuals in neuroimaging analysis. However, they are computationally intensive, since they have to optimize an objective function independently for each pair of surfaces. In this paper, we present a fast learning-based algorithm that makes use of the recent development in spherical Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spherical cortical surface registration. Given a set of surface pairs without supervised information such as ground truth deformation fields or anatomical landmarks, we formulate the registration as a parametric function and learn its parameters by enforcing the feature similarity between one surface and the other one warped by the estimated deformation field using the function. Then, given a new pair of surfaces, we can quickly infer the spherical deformation field registering one surface to the other one. We model this parametric function using three orthogonal Spherical U-Nets and use spherical transform layers to warp the spherical surfaces, while imposing smoothness constraints on the deformation field. All the layers in the network are well-defined and differentiable, thus the parameters can be effectively learned. We show that our method achieves accurate cortical alignment results on 102 subjects, comparable to two state-of-the-art methods: Spherical Demons and MSM, while runs much faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.