ReviewGenes & diseases2021
Immune checkpoint: The novel target for antitumor therapy.
Review in Genes & diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging immune checkpoint targets and combination strategies in blood cancer immunotherapy.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- New progress and clinical research translation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in systemic therapy of gallbladder cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Quantitative analysis of lymphocyte exhaustion markers in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Exosome-mediated Crosstalk in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment: Critical Drivers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025Review
- Exploring the application of metal-based photothermal agents in photothermal therapy combined with immune checkpoint therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Emerging druggable targets for immune checkpoint modulation in cancer immunotherapy: the iceberg lies beneath the surface.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2024Review
- Stable triangle: nanomedicine-based synergistic application of phototherapy and immunotherapy for tumor treatment.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Toxicity of Cancer Immunotherapies in Older Patients: Does Age Make a Difference?Drugs & aging · 2024Review
- Genetic landscape and clinical significance of cuproptosis-related genes in liver hepatocellular carcinoma.Genes & diseases · 2024Article
- EGFR, HLA-G, CD70, c-MET, and NY-ESO1 as potential biomarkers in high grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024Article
- Exploiting the damaging effects of ROS for therapeutic use by deactivating cell-free chromatin: the alchemy of resveratrol and copper.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- The biogenesis and secretion of exosomes and multivesicular bodies (MVBs): Intercellular shuttles and implications in human diseases.Genes & diseases · 2023Review
- Natural-Product-Derived Adjunctive Treatments to Conventional Therapy and Their Immunoregulatory Activities in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exosomal circRNA: emerging insights into cancer progression and clinical application potential.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Exosomes and circular RNAs: promising partners in hepatocellular carcinoma from bench to bedside.Discover oncology · 2023Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibition mediated with liposomal nanomedicine for cancer therapy.Military Medical Research · 2023Review
- LncRNA MEG3 promotes chemosensitivity of osteosarcoma by regulating antitumor immunity via miR-21-5p/p53 pathway and autophagy.Genes & diseases · 2023Article
- TMIGD2 as a potential therapeutic target in glioma patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Cell-free chromatin particles released from dying cancer cells activate immune checkpoints in human lymphocytes: implications for cancer therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Eribulin mesylate exerts antitumor effects via CD103.Oncoimmunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhibitory checkpoint molecules include programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), human endogenous retrovirus-H Long terminal repeat-associating 2 (HHLA2), B7 homolog 4 protein (B7-H4), T cell membrane protein-3 (TIM-3) and Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), which are up-regulated during tumorigenesis. These pathways are essential to down-regulate the immune system by blocking the activation of T cells. In recent years, immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) against PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4 or TIM-3 has made remarkable progress in the clinical application, revolutionizing the treatment of malignant tumors and improving patients' overall survival. However, the efficacy of ICBs in some patients does not seem to be good enough, and more immune-related adverse events (irAEs) will inevitably occur. Therefore, biomarkers research provides practical guidance for clinicians to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from or exhibit resistance to particular types of immune checkpoint therapy. There are two points in general. On the one hand, given the spatial and temporal differential expression of immune checkpoint molecules during immunosuppression process, it is essential to understand their mechanisms to design the most effective individualized therapy. On the other hand, due to the lack of potent immune checkpoints, it is necessary to combine them with novel biomarkers (such as exosomes and ctDNA) and other anticancer modalities (such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.