ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Oral atenolol treatment for infantile hemangiomas: clinical analysis of 133 consecutive patients.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of interventions for infantile hemangioma compared with oral propranolol: an updated systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- A chitosan-based thermosensitive hydrogel incorporating propranolol nanoparticles to promote early osseointegration and peri-implant soft-tissue healing.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Identification of new inhibitors of NS5 from dengue virus using saturation transfer difference (STD-NMR) and molecular docking studies.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Medical Management of Infantile Hemangiomas: An Update.Paediatric drugs · 2022Review
- Comparing the Effectiveness of Propranolol versus Atenolol in Inducing Clinical Clearance in the Treatment of Infantile Haemangioma: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most frequently occurring pediatric lesions. Oral propranolol has been shown to be safe and effective in infants with IHs. Side effects such as sleep disturbances have been associated with propranolol. Atenolol is a hydrophilic, selective β1-blocker and therefore may be not associated with side effects attributable to β2-adrenergic receptor blockade and lipophilicity. However, the efficacy of atenolol in the treatment of IHs is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of atenolol in the treatment of proliferating IHs in a clinical cohort including 133 consecutive patients.
methodsIn this study, we enrolled 133 patients diagnosed as proliferating IHs from the routine clinical and referral practices of the authors. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institute Review Board of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital and Helsinki Declaration. Clinical characteristics, including demographic data and clinical morphology, were collated. Responses to oral atenolol therapy were graded as: excellent, good, fair and poor. According to the reaction to atenolol treatment, additional medications or therapy were used for IH patients to achieve satisfactory clinical results.
resultsIn this study, 128 (96.2%) of 133 IH patients responded to oral atenolol, and the response rate (RR) was significantly different for different ages of patients (P<0.05), with the youngest patients having the highest RR. The mean time of treatment was 4.9 months. Forty-one patients who exhibited residual hyperpigmentation or telangiectasia were further treated with timolol maleate cream (n=32) or pulsed dye laser (n=9). All the 41 patients showed positive response. No life-threatening complications were noted during and after oral atenolol. Only 4 (3.0%) of 133 patients developed minor complications including diarrhea. No agitation and bronchospasm were noted in our study.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that atenolol was effective in the treatment of IHs. Compared to propranolol, atenolol seems to have a similar effect on IHs. Furthermore, atenolol seems to be less frequently associated with potentially life-threatening side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.